Conversation
The list is sorted alphabetically Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
profile/README.md
Outdated
| - [uStack](https://gitlab.com/uhurutec/stack/ustack) - uStack is a GitOps-based installer for OpenStack on Kubernetes using YAOOK. | ||
| - [YAOOK](https://yaook.cloud) - Yaook is a distribution of Openstack on top of kubernetes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be good to extend here a bit and link those to the SCS ecosystem. Both of them are solutions, which allow and actively support an SCS compliant deployment and AFAIK, there are certified SCS environments using those out there, so we should mention that as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anjastrunk @mbuechse @scoopex @jschoone any suggestions how we should phrase this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be good to extend here a bit and link those to the SCS ecosystem. Both of them are solutions, which allow and actively support an SCS compliant deployment and AFAIK, there are certified SCS environments using those out there, so we should mention that as well.
Indeed @jklare - thanks for pinging the others regarding those two lines, much appreciated!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looping in @horazont, @mrhopeman or @harmathy as they're very involved with yaook as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@berendt thanks. that is good. I'll adjust the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@berendt both YAOOK and Yaook are used. But you're right Yaook is most commonly used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would prefer the following description for Yaook: "Yaook is a lifecycle management tool for OpenStack on top of Kubernetes". In the context of ALASCA, we use it this way in the descriptions (see, for example, https://alasca.cloud/projects/yaook/). And in my understanding it's "Yaook" and not "YAOOK" today.
I like the description of @berendt as we are not really a own distribution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would prefer the following description for Yaook: "Yaook is a lifecycle management tool for OpenStack on top of Kubernetes". In the context of ALASCA, we use it this way in the descriptions (see, for example, https://alasca.cloud/projects/yaook/). And in my understanding it's "Yaook" and not "YAOOK" today.
I like the description of @berendt as we are not really a own distribution.
Technically we are a distribution since we package our own OpenStack images.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mrhopeman @harmathy since you two are the maintainers of Yaook, I leave it to you two to finalize that sentence and whether or not to call it a distribution.
Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
Co-authored-by: mauhau <33893932+mauhau@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
|
thanks @mauhau for the addition to the sentence about uStack! |
6 participants
This is an attempt to undust this section. The list is sorted alphabetically.
I am happy about suggestions on how to improve this section further.