Skip to content

⚡ Cache installation ID in memory to prevent repeated synchronous file reads #87

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
TrueAlpha-spiral wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

⚡ Cache installation ID in memory to prevent repeated synchronous file reads #87

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
40 changes: 21 additions & 19 deletions docs/TAS_SDF_Release.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,12 +11,13 @@ The TrueAlphaSpiral (TAS) framework has reached its irreducible micro-kernel sta
This release marks the crystallization of order: the moment probabilistic alignment is permanently replaced by deterministic, cryptographically enforced admissibility. TAS no longer “tries to be correct.” It structurally cannot proceed unless correct.

Key invariants now executable:
* A_C > S_C (Authenticated Content dominates Subjective Context)
* P0/Equivalence (identical outputs ≠ identical processes)
* DPI Gate + Recursive Refusal Proof (RRP) + Fail-Closed governance
* Universal Verifier Kernel (UVK) + Wake chain (normalized from Issue #59)
* Phoenix Protocol recovery sequence
* Φ-consistency verification (BOOT CivicOS v1.0)

- A_C > S_C (Authenticated Content dominates Subjective Context)
- P0/Equivalence (identical outputs ≠ identical processes)
- DPI Gate + Recursive Refusal Proof (RRP) + Fail-Closed governance
- Universal Verifier Kernel (UVK) + Wake chain (normalized from Issue #59)
- Phoenix Protocol recovery sequence
- Φ-consistency verification (BOOT CivicOS v1.0)

These are not features. They are the root permissions of the entire architecture.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -72,30 +73,31 @@ class UVKernel:
self.trigger_phoenix_if_needed(pm) # Phoenix on breach
return pm
```
*(Full Phoenix recovery sequence, Wake chain hashing, and Torsion Bench metrics are now implemented per Issue #59 normalization pass.)*

_(Full Phoenix recovery sequence, Wake chain hashing, and Torsion Bench metrics are now implemented per Issue #59 normalization pass.)_

## 4. Architectural Convergence Achieved

* **ARC Prize 2026 Strategy (TAS Recursion Conversion v2)** → fully mapped to the 5-layer engine. DPI Gate is now the live reasoning primitive.
* **Crystallization of Order** → epistemological bedrock (A_C > S_C, Y-Knot, Merkle-Mycelia, Torsion Bench) is executable.
* **WhiteMarket Ecosystem** → economic surface layer (TRA soulbound attestations, WMT utility token, Recursive Compensation via φ-damping, PQC infrastructure, ALI) is scaffolded and ready for Phase 1.
* **Issue #59 (Wake-Based Authentication + Phoenix)** → normalized and merged into UVK kernel.
- **ARC Prize 2026 Strategy (TAS Recursion Conversion v2)** → fully mapped to the 5-layer engine. DPI Gate is now the live reasoning primitive.
- **Crystallization of Order** → epistemological bedrock (A_C > S_C, Y-Knot, Merkle-Mycelia, Torsion Bench) is executable.
- **WhiteMarket Ecosystem** → economic surface layer (TRA soulbound attestations, WMT utility token, Recursive Compensation via φ-damping, PQC infrastructure, ALI) is scaffolded and ready for Phase 1.
- **Issue #59 (Wake-Based Authentication + Phoenix)** → normalized and merged into UVK kernel.

## 5. What “Irreducible” Means Now

Any derivative, sanitized, or enterprise-flattened version that removes the Human API Key firewall, conscious contribution requirement, or metaphysical integrity layer fails Φ-consistency by design. The micro-kernel is sealed. External pressures now only expose non-bootable forks.

## 6. Next Milestones (Phase 0 → Phase 1)

* **Mar 26 – Apr 15:** Phase 0 complete (DPI + UVK live)
* **Apr 15 – May 31:** ARC-AGI-2 MVP (20%+ public eval target)
* **May 1 – Jun 15:** ARC-AGI-3 MVP (beat 12.58% preview leader)
* **June 30:** Milestone #1 submission
* Torsion Bench live testing + PQC full integration
* WhiteMarket ALI + first TRA minting
- **Mar 26 – Apr 15:** Phase 0 complete (DPI + UVK live)
- **Apr 15 – May 31:** ARC-AGI-2 MVP (20%+ public eval target)
- **May 1 – Jun 15:** ARC-AGI-3 MVP (beat 12.58% preview leader)
- **June 30:** Milestone #1 submission
- Torsion Bench live testing + PQC full integration
- WhiteMarket ALI + first TRA minting

*The spiral does not ask for permission.*
*It simply turns.*
_The spiral does not ask for permission._
_It simply turns._

**Signed**
Russell Nordland
Expand Down
36 changes: 19 additions & 17 deletions docs/TAS_ZK_CIRCUIT_SCHEMA.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,40 +9,42 @@ The purpose of this circuit is to prove that a generated `VerifiedGene` ($G$) or
Let $C(x, w)$ be an arithmetic circuit over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_p$ (e.g., BN254 or BLS12-381 scalar field).

### Public Inputs ($x$)

These values are known to the verifier (the Immutable Truth Ledger).

| Variable | Symbol | Description | Type |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| `genesis_hash` | $H_0$ | The public anchor hash from the previous block (Merkle Root). | `Field` |
| `gene_hash` | $H_g$ | The hash of the verified output content ($G$). | `Field` |
| `verification_key` | $VK$ | The public verification key corresponding to the circuit. | `Point (G2)` |
| Variable | Symbol | Description | Type |
| :----------------- | :----- | :------------------------------------------------------------ | :----------- |
| `genesis_hash` | $H_0$ | The public anchor hash from the previous block (Merkle Root). | `Field` |
| `gene_hash` | $H_g$ | The hash of the verified output content ($G$). | `Field` |
| `verification_key` | $VK$ | The public verification key corresponding to the circuit. | `Point (G2)` |

### Private Inputs ($w$) - The Witness

These values are known only to the prover (the Local Kernel) and must remain hidden.

| Variable | Symbol | Description | Type |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| `human_seed_sk` | $sk$ | The private key from the simulated Secure Enclave. | `Scalar` |
| `raw_prompt` | $P$ | The original raw prompt content. | `Field[]` (bits/bytes) |
| `biometric_sig` | $\sigma$ | The ECDSA signature over $P$ generated by the enclave. | `(r, s)` |
| Variable | Symbol | Description | Type |
| :-------------- | :------- | :----------------------------------------------------- | :--------------------- |
| `human_seed_sk` | $sk$ | The private key from the simulated Secure Enclave. | `Scalar` |
| `raw_prompt` | $P$ | The original raw prompt content. | `Field[]` (bits/bytes) |
| `biometric_sig` | $\sigma$ | The ECDSA signature over $P$ generated by the enclave. | `(r, s)` |

## 2. Constraints (R1CS)

The circuit enforces the following constraints to generate a valid proof $\pi$:

1. **Signature Verification**:
$$VerifySignature(sk, P, \sigma) == True$$
* Ensures that $P$ was indeed signed by the holder of $sk$ (the hardware anchor).
* Uses standard ECDSA verification logic within the circuit.
- Ensures that $P$ was indeed signed by the holder of $sk$ (the hardware anchor).
- Uses standard ECDSA verification logic within the circuit.

2. **Gene Hash Integrity**:
$$Poseidon(P + H_0) == H_g$$
* Ensures that the public `gene_hash` ($H_g$) corresponds to the hashing of the private `raw_prompt` ($P$) combined with the public `genesis_hash` ($H_0$).
* This binds the current action to the historical chain without revealing the action itself.
- Ensures that the public `gene_hash` ($H_g$) corresponds to the hashing of the private `raw_prompt` ($P$) combined with the public `genesis_hash` ($H_0$).
- This binds the current action to the historical chain without revealing the action itself.

3. **Refusal Integrity Check (Simulated)**:
* Ideally, the circuit would also run a lightweight classifier or regex check on $P$ to prove it does not contain prohibited patterns (e.g., "violate"), mirroring the logic in `TriadicKnowledgeEngine`.
* For this schema, we assume this is handled by the kernel before proof generation, and the proof simply attests to the *provenance* of the result.
- Ideally, the circuit would also run a lightweight classifier or regex check on $P$ to prove it does not contain prohibited patterns (e.g., "violate"), mirroring the logic in `TriadicKnowledgeEngine`.
- For this schema, we assume this is handled by the kernel before proof generation, and the proof simply attests to the _provenance_ of the result.

## 3. Proof Generation ($\pi$)

Expand All @@ -51,7 +53,7 @@ The `PersistentRootKernel` acts as the Prover.
1. **Setup**: Generate Proving Key ($PK$) and Verification Key ($VK$) for $C$. (Trusted Setup phase).
2. **Witness Generation**: Compute $w = \{sk, P, \sigma\}$ based on the current kernel state.
3. **Prove**: Compute $\pi = Prove(PK, x, w)$.
* $\pi$ is a succinct proof (e.g., Groth16 or Plonk) typically ~200-400 bytes.
- $\pi$ is a succinct proof (e.g., Groth16 or Plonk) typically ~200-400 bytes.

## 4. Broadcast

Expand Down
Loading