Update coverage requirement from <8,>=7.13.5 to >=7.14.0,<8

[dependabot]

Updates the requirements on coverage to permit the latest version.

Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 7.14.0 — 2026-05-10

• Feature: now when running one of the reporting commands, if there are parallel data files that need combining, they will be implicitly combined before creating the report. There is no option to avoid the combination; let us know if you have a use case that requires it. Thanks, Tim Hatch <pull 2162_>. Closes issue 1781.

• Fix: the output from combine was too verbose, listing each file considered. Now it shows a single line with the counts of files combined, files skipped, and files with errors. The -q flag suppresses this line. The old detailed lines are available with the new --debug=combine option.

• Fix: running a Python file through a symlink now sets the sys.path correctly, matching regular Python behavior. Fixes issue 2157_.

• Fix: Collector.flush_data could fail with "RuntimeError: Set changed size during iteration" when a tracer in another thread added a line to the per-file set that add_lines (or add_arcs) was iterating. The values passed to CoverageData are now snapshotted via dict.copy() and set.copy(), which are atomic under the GIL. Thanks, Alex Vandiver <pull 2165_>_.

• Fix: the soft keyword lazy is now bolded in HTML reports.

• We are no longer testing eventlet support. Eventlet started issuing stern deprecation warnings that break our tests. Our support code is still there.

.. _issue 1781: coveragepy/coveragepy#1781 .. _issue 2157: coveragepy/coveragepy#2157 .. _pull 2162: coveragepy/coveragepy#2162 .. _pull 2165: coveragepy/coveragepy#2165

.. _changes_7-13-5:

Version 7.13.5 — 2026-03-17

• Fix: issue 2138_ describes a memory leak that happened when repeatedly using the Coverage API with in-memory data. This is now fixed.

• Fix: the markdown-formatted coverage report didn't fully escape special characters in file paths (issue 2141). This would be very unlikely to cause a problem, but now it's done properly, thanks to Ellie Ayla <pull 2142_>.

• Fix: the C extension wouldn't build on VS2019, but now it does (issue 2145_).

... (truncated)

Commits

• 646351b docs: sample HTML for 7.14.0
• 39cd015 docs: prep for 7.14.0
• 649e8aa docs: thanks Alex Vandiver for #2165
• 8cd392e fix: snapshot data in Collector.flush_data to avoid threading race (#2165)
• c48e0ed fix: less output for combining
• c2a3a28 docs: explain the change from #2162
• 1cd47aa fix: implicit combine-during-report now removes the combined data files
• 2d99fd7 feat: automatically combine coverage in report, thanks Tim Hatch (#2162)
• 9fbdcdf fix: lazy soft keywords are bolded
• 5de7d02 build: oops, misplaced quote
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Labels

The following labels could not be found: python, 🤖 Dependabot. Please create them before Dependabot can add them to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}