Add LA 100-P information to AMDS/current card section in AMDC article

[noguchi-takahiro]

This PR adds LA 100-P information to AMDS/current card section in AMDC article to close #155.

Notes

Here is the note from a previous student of how to determine the burden resister:

For the current card, the burden voltage was chosen as 10V by the card designer so that it is within the range of the Analog to Digital Converter.
If you choose anything lower than 10V, that should be okay.

I see your concern that the datasheet recommends the burden resistor to be 0-33 ohms. So in your case the burden voltage will be lower than 10V
For a current range of 150V, your secondary current will be I_secondary = 150/2000 = 0.075A.
(V_burden = R*I_secondary = 33*0.075 = 2.475V)

For my card designs I think that I had chosen 28 Ohms

Self-Review

1. Are all files under 300 kB (if not, please carefully assess whether it is worth committing them)? Yes
2. Are all files named according to the appropriate naming convention, i.e., dash-case, camelCase, snake case? Yes
3. Do all Markdown files follow the CONTRIBUTING article template? Yes
4. Do all links work in the material that the PR is adding? No, one link is not working in resources section, which will be updated through this PR.
5. Is the PR configured to close the correct issue(s)? Yes
6. Did the PR fully address the Approach section of the issue(s) it is closing? Yes

Reviewer Instructions

Reviewers, please copy and paste a suitable review checklist into your review and answer all questions.

Appendix

This section should be the same for all PRs. Do not edit this section when creating a PR.

Review Checklists

Checklists maintained by the eLev lab for research repositories include:

• Report checklist
• Publication archive checklist (select a checklist from the Approach that corresponds to the step this PR seeks to complete).
• Standard checklist (if none of the above apply).

Standard checklist

1. Are all files under 300 kB (if not, please carefully assess whether it is worth committing them)? **Yes or No**
2. Are all files named according to the appropriate [naming convention](https://github.com/Severson-Group/research-repo-template?tab=readme-ov-file#file-naming), i.e., dash-case, camelCase, snake case? **Yes or No**
3. Do all Markdown files follow the [CONTRIBUTING article template](https://github.com/Severson-Group/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#markdown-documentation-template)? **Yes or No**
4. Do all links work in the material that the PR is adding? **Yes or No**
5. Is the PR configured to close the correct issue(s)? **Yes or No**
6. Did the PR fully address the `Approach` section of the issue(s) it is closing? **Yes or No**

Please work on addressing any **No** items.

[noguchi-takahiro]

@Daehoon-Sung when you have a chance, could you review the updated current card article of AMDC doc? Here is the rendered article: Current - AMDC Platform.pdf

I added a new sensor information of LA 100-P:

Datasheet can be found in this PR that we are planning to merge soon as well. Also, I am wondering if we want to do the same calculation using the LA 100-P as follows:

Do you have any ideas of how we can achieve sensing of Vout = 0V @-150 A and Vout = 5V @150 A using the LA 100-P sensor?