Skip to content

Conversation

@asanchezcastillo
Copy link
Contributor

@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo commented Nov 25, 2025

Description

After (#876), the OpHitFinder algorithm for realistic MC workflow was missconfigured. The OpHitFinder module was taking raw waveforms coming from the pmtpulseoscillation module instead of deconvolved waveforms coming from opdecopmt module. This PR corrects the label for the OpHitFinder algorithm to use deconvolved waveforms.

It does also:

  • Remove XA reconstruction for light-only reconstruction fcl.
  • Uses the correct drift estimation curve for realistic MC.
  • Updates PMT detection efficiencies for better data/MC agreement

Please provide a detailed description of the changes this pull request introduces.

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

$${\color{red}\bf{\textrm{IMPORTANT UPDATE June 22nd 2025:}}}$$ If you are making a PR which is intended as a patch for the CURRENT production (which started in Spring 2025), you must make two PRs: one for develop and one for the production/v10_06_00 branch.

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

Checklist

  • Added at least 1 label from available labels.
  • Assigned at least 1 reviewer under Reviewers,
  • Assigned all contributers including yourself under Assignees
  • Linked any relevant issues under Developement
  • Does this PR affect CAF data format? If so, please assign a CAF maintainer (PetrilloAtWork or JosiePaton) as additional reviewer.
  • Does this affect the standard workflow?
  • Is this PR a patch for the ongoing production? If so, separate PR must also be made for production/v10_06_00 branch!

Relevant PR links (optional)

Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?

Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)

Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?

@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo self-assigned this Nov 25, 2025
@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 25, 2025
@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2025 16:13
@linyan-w
Copy link
Contributor

trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_14_00 SBNSoftware/sbndaq-artdaq-core@v1_10_06 SBNSoftware/sbn*@SBN_SUITE_v10_14_00

@linyan-w
Copy link
Contributor

linyan-w commented Nov 26, 2025

Trying the magic CI command!
... and nothing happens. Apparently I don't have certain permissions?

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ CI build for SBND Warning at phase ci_tests SBND on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

@nathanielerowe
Copy link
Contributor

Approved, thanks @linyan-w!

@nathanielerowe nathanielerowe merged commit ced6c2c into develop Nov 26, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@linyan-w linyan-w moved this from Reviewer Approved to In tagged release in SBND 2025 Fall Production Dec 2, 2025
@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo deleted the bugifx/acastill_realisticPMT branch December 11, 2025 20:27
@asanchezcastillo asanchezcastillo restored the bugifx/acastill_realisticPMT branch December 11, 2025 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

Status: In tagged release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants