(Bug) Update sentence_encoder.py: clamping cos_sim between -1 and 1 to avoid floating point precision errors in torch.acos(cos_sim)#804
Merged
qiyanjun merged 1 commit intoQData:masterfrom Apr 17, 2026
Conversation
If we compare two equal embeddings, emb1 == emb2, the cosine similarity should be 1. However, due to floating point precision, we might end up with a value slightly greater than 1, such as 1.00004. This results in an undefined NaN in torch.acos(cos_sim), causing get_angular_sim to return NaN instead of 1. By using cos_sim = torch.clamp(cos_sim, -1.0, 1.0), we ensure that the cos_sim value remains within the valid range expected by torch.acos(cos_sim).
yanjunqiAz
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2026
Collaborator
yanjunqiAz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. This is a well-known floating point issue — cosine similarity can produce values like 1.0000001 due to precision, which makes acos return NaN. The clamp is the standard fix.
Verified the context: the fix goes right between the cosine computation and acos in get_angular_sim(). Correct and safe.
qiyanjun
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Summary
If we compare two equal embeddings, emb1 == emb2, the cosine similarity should be 1. However, due to floating point precision, we might end up with a value slightly greater than 1, such as 1.00004. This results in an undefined NaN in torch.acos(cos_sim), causing get_angular_sim to return NaN instead of 1. By using cos_sim = torch.clamp(cos_sim, -1.0, 1.0), we ensure that the cos_sim value remains within the valid range expected by torch.acos(cos_sim).
I am using TextAttack to perform attacks on LLMs. For testing, I mostly run custom attacks that lead to different embeddings, emb1 and emb2. Occasionally, my attacks do not change any words, but due to the internal randomness of LLMs during the attack search, performing a second inference step results in a misclassification. Since the two samples are the same but classified differently during the USE metric evaluation, they should result in a cosine similarity of 1. However, I am encountering NaN values after conducting USE evaluations. I found that the issue is due to floating-point precision.
Additions
Changes
Deletions
Checklist
.rstfile inTextAttack/docs/apidoc.'