Skip to content

Conversation

@marcoAntonioNina
Copy link
Contributor

@marcoAntonioNina marcoAntonioNina commented Feb 24, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

When a field has a RequireIf validation set, the ( * ) shown for a required field is not displayed.

Solution

  • Add prop TransientData

How to Test

  1. Create a process
  2. Create a screen and add some fields required if
  3. Create a nested screen with some fields that are required and add them to the first screen.
  4. Create a case and try to show the RequireIf functionality.

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor

@marcoAntonioNina PR approved

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit 9412786 into release-2025-winter Feb 26, 2025
9 of 13 checks passed
@ryancooley ryancooley deleted the bugfix/FOUR-22102 branch February 26, 2025 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants