docs: add proposal 137 — section filtering for parameter extraction#695
Merged
Conversation
Notes which PlanExe report sections to keep vs. drop when feeding a parameter-extraction LLM for Monte Carlo / napkin-math modelling — focused on preserving numeric values and assumptions while trimming low-signal sections.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds
docs/proposals/137-section_filtering_for_parameter_extraction.md.The proposal documents which sections of a PlanExe HTML/Markdown report are worth sending to a parameter-extraction LLM for Monte Carlo / napkin-math modelling, and which sections can usually be removed to save tokens — keeping the parts that contain explicit numeric values and important assumptions, while trimming low-signal sections.
Test plan