added faq page #90
added faq page #90
Conversation
|
@Dhairya211206 is attempting to deploy a commit to the idan lodzki's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughA new FAQ documentation page is added to OpsiMate docs covering general questions, installation, configuration, and community contributions. The sidebar configuration is updated to include the FAQ entry and reformat User Management items. A TypeScript no-check directive is added to tsconfig.json to suppress type checking. Changes
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
opsimate-docs/docs/FAQ.md (1)
47-47: Consider reducing exclamation mark usage.The FAQ uses several exclamation marks for emphasis. While this creates an enthusiastic tone, consider using them more sparingly for a more professional documentation style.
-Not for small changes! For major updates, please open an issue to discuss the approach first. +Not for small changes. For major updates, please open an issue to discuss the approach first.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
opsimate-docs/docs/FAQ.md(1 hunks)opsimate-docs/sidebars.js(2 hunks)opsimate-docs/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
opsimate-docs/docs/FAQ.md
[style] ~47-~47: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 3 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1522 characters long)
Context: ... contributing?** Not for small changes! For major updates, please open an issue...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
opsimate-docs/sidebars.js (2)
90-94: Formatting change looks good.The multi-line formatting of the User Management items improves readability.
97-97: FAQ entry added successfully.The FAQ sidebar entry is correctly positioned and will properly reference the new FAQ.md documentation file.
opsimate-docs/docs/FAQ.md (3)
1-5: YAML front matter is correctly formatted.The document ID and title are properly configured for Docusaurus.
6-56: FAQ content is well-structured and informative.The FAQ page is well-organized with clear sections, appropriate use of emojis for visual navigation, and covers essential topics for users. The content provides good starting points with links to more detailed documentation.
28-28: All internal documentation links are valid.The three files referenced in FAQ.md (lines 28, 31, 41, 53-55) all exist:
intro.md,core-features.md, anddevelopment.md. The links resolve correctly.opsimate-docs/tsconfig.json (1)
2-3: The @ts-nocheck directive is appropriate here—ignore this review comment.The tsconfig.json file explicitly states it is "not used in compilation. It is here just for a nice editor experience." The
@ts-nocheckcomment suppresses type checking in this configuration file, which is correct because the file exists only for IDE editor support, not for the build process. This does not defeat TypeScript's purpose; it acknowledges that this particular file is configuration-only and not part of the compilation pipeline. The file extends@docusaurus/tsconfigfor editor hints, and the directive prevents spurious IDE warnings for a file that has no role in actual type checking.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| // @ts-check | ||
| // @ts-nocheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove contradictory type-checking directives.
Having both @ts-check (Line 12) and @ts-nocheck (Line 13) in the same file is contradictory. The @ts-nocheck directive effectively cancels out @ts-check, disabling type checking entirely.
Either remove @ts-nocheck if you want type checking enabled, or remove both directives if type checking is not needed:
// @ts-check
-// @ts-nocheck📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // @ts-check | |
| // @ts-nocheck | |
| // @ts-check |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In opsimate-docs/sidebars.js around lines 12 to 13, the file contains both "//
@ts-check" and "// @ts-nocheck" which are contradictory; remove the "//
@ts-nocheck" line if you want TypeScript checking enabled, or remove both
directives (or keep only "// @ts-nocheck") if you want to disable type
checking—update the file to contain a single consistent directive reflecting the
desired type-checking behavior.
|
@Dhairya211206 add some screenshot from mobile and from PC |
2 participants
Issue Reference
What Was Changed
Why Was It Changed
Screenshots
Additional Context (Optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit