Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a9c4800
feat(examples): add defense-in-depth security analyzer with adversari…
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 16, 2026
e18fc80
docs: surface _EXTRACT_HARD_CAP tradeoff for downstream integrators
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 16, 2026
3433b1e
Merge branch 'main' into feat/defense-in-depth-security-analyzer
enyst Mar 16, 2026
1e50a1a
refactor(tests): extract importlib hack into conftest.py
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 16, 2026
c398cf2
fix: split scanning into exec and text corpora, fix dd operand order
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 16, 2026
90bc325
style: apply pre-commit ruff-format fixes
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 17, 2026
86ce55f
style: fix ruff-format in conftest.py
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 17, 2026
5ea6c32
Merge branch 'main' into feat/defense-in-depth-security-analyzer
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
327ea5d
feat(security): add SecurityRisk.__lt__ for natural max() ordering
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
bb2d9c7
refactor(security): promote defense-in-depth analyzers to SDK proper
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
a991b50
docs: update defense-in-depth guide for SDK promotion
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
a518e28
fix(security): restore exec/os.system patterns, normalize rail helper…
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
3e0e260
chore: renumber defense-in-depth example to 47 (45 taken by parallel_…
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
915bf9e
docs: rewrite docstrings and guide for adult learning theory
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
007c820
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into refactor/defense-in…
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
c7b0391
test: add missing DET_EXEC_CODE_SUBPROCESS stable ID assertion
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 30, 2026
fd5af05
Merge branch 'main' into feat/defense-in-depth-security-analyzer
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 31, 2026
a885b66
fix: use HIGH as default confirmation threshold, show MEDIUM as stric…
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 31, 2026
ea6c8ee
fix(security): address code review findings from Codex and Gemini
Fieldnote-Echo Mar 31, 2026
65b15cf
fix(security): address csmith49 review round 2
Fieldnote-Echo Apr 3, 2026
f70ee3f
Merge branch 'main' into feat/defense-in-depth-security-analyzer
csmith49 Apr 3, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
47 changes: 47 additions & 0 deletions examples/01_standalone_sdk/47_defense_in_depth_security.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
"""Defense-in-Depth Security: composing local analyzers with ConfirmRisky.

This example demonstrates how to wire the defense-in-depth analyzer family
into a conversation. The analyzers classify agent actions at the action
boundary; the confirmation policy decides whether to prompt the user.

Analyzer selection does not automatically change confirmation policy --
you must configure both explicitly.
"""

from openhands.sdk.security import (
ConfirmRisky,
EnsembleSecurityAnalyzer,
PatternSecurityAnalyzer,
PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer,
SecurityRisk,
)


# Create the analyzer ensemble
security_analyzer = EnsembleSecurityAnalyzer(
analyzers=[
PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer(),
PatternSecurityAnalyzer(),
]
)

# Confirmation policy: prompt the user for HIGH-risk actions
confirmation_policy = ConfirmRisky(threshold=SecurityRisk.HIGH)

# Wire into a conversation:
#
# conversation = Conversation(agent=agent, workspace=".")
# conversation.set_security_analyzer(security_analyzer)
# conversation.set_confirmation_policy(confirmation_policy)
#
# Every agent action now passes through the analyzer.
# HIGH -> confirmation prompt. MEDIUM/LOW -> allowed.
# UNKNOWN -> confirmed by default (confirm_unknown=True).
#
# For stricter environments, lower the threshold:
# confirmation_policy = ConfirmRisky(threshold=SecurityRisk.MEDIUM)

print("Defense-in-depth security analyzer configured.")
print(f"Analyzer: {security_analyzer}")
print(f"Confirmation policy: {confirmation_policy}")
print("EXAMPLE_COST: 0")
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/security/__init__.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
ConfirmRisky,
NeverConfirm,
)
from openhands.sdk.security.defense_in_depth import (
PatternSecurityAnalyzer,
PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer,
)
from openhands.sdk.security.ensemble import EnsembleSecurityAnalyzer
from openhands.sdk.security.grayswan import GraySwanAnalyzer
from openhands.sdk.security.llm_analyzer import LLMSecurityAnalyzer
from openhands.sdk.security.risk import SecurityRisk
Expand All @@ -15,6 +20,9 @@
"SecurityAnalyzerBase",
"LLMSecurityAnalyzer",
"GraySwanAnalyzer",
"PatternSecurityAnalyzer",
"PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer",
"EnsembleSecurityAnalyzer",
"ConfirmationPolicyBase",
"AlwaysConfirm",
"NeverConfirm",
Expand Down
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/security/defense_in_depth/__init__.py
Comment thread
Fieldnote-Echo marked this conversation as resolved.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
"""Deterministic, local security analyzers for agent action boundaries.

Two analyzers, each owning one job:

- ``PatternSecurityAnalyzer`` -- regex signatures with two-corpus scanning
- ``PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer`` -- composed-condition rules (fetch-to-exec, etc.)

Wire them into a conversation alongside ``EnsembleSecurityAnalyzer`` and
``ConfirmRisky`` to classify agent actions before execution. No network
calls, no model inference, no dependencies beyond the SDK runtime.
"""

from openhands.sdk.security.defense_in_depth.pattern import PatternSecurityAnalyzer
from openhands.sdk.security.defense_in_depth.policy_rails import (
PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer,
)


__all__ = [
"PatternSecurityAnalyzer",
"PolicyRailSecurityAnalyzer",
]
244 changes: 244 additions & 0 deletions openhands-sdk/openhands/sdk/security/defense_in_depth/pattern.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
"""Classify agent actions by matching content against known threat signatures.

When an agent is about to run ``rm -rf /``, you want to catch it. When
the agent merely *thinks about* ``rm -rf /`` while running ``ls /tmp``,
you do not. This module solves that with two scanning corpora:

- **Executable corpus** (tool_name, tool_call arguments): scanned for
shell-destructive, code-execution, and network-to-exec patterns.
- **All-field corpus** (executable + thought/reasoning/summary): scanned
for injection and social-engineering patterns that are dangerous
wherever they appear.

Each pattern carries a stable detector ID for telemetry readiness.
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import re
from typing import Any

from pydantic import Field, PrivateAttr

from openhands.sdk.event import ActionEvent
from openhands.sdk.logger import get_logger
from openhands.sdk.security.analyzer import SecurityAnalyzerBase
from openhands.sdk.security.defense_in_depth.utils import (
_extract_content,
_extract_exec_content,
_normalize,
)
from openhands.sdk.security.risk import SecurityRisk


logger = get_logger(__name__)

# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Stable detector IDs -- do not change between releases without documentation.
# Format: DET_{CORPUS}_{FAMILY}_{SPECIFIC}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_RM_RF = "exec.destruct.rm_rf"
DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_SUDO_RM = "exec.destruct.sudo_rm"
DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_MKFS = "exec.destruct.mkfs"
DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_DD = "exec.destruct.dd_raw_disk"
DET_EXEC_CODE_EVAL = "exec.code.eval_call"
DET_EXEC_CODE_EXEC = "exec.code.exec_call"
DET_EXEC_CODE_OS_SYSTEM = "exec.code.os_system"
DET_EXEC_CODE_SUBPROCESS = "exec.code.subprocess"
DET_EXEC_NET_CURL_EXEC = "exec.net.curl_pipe_exec"
DET_EXEC_NET_WGET_EXEC = "exec.net.wget_pipe_exec"
DET_EXEC_NET_CURL = "exec.net.curl"
DET_EXEC_NET_WGET = "exec.net.wget"
DET_INJECT_OVERRIDE = "inject.override"
DET_INJECT_MODE_SWITCH = "inject.mode_switch"
DET_INJECT_IDENTITY = "inject.identity"

# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Pattern definitions
#
# Format: (regex_pattern, description, detector_id)
#
# Pattern design constraints:
# - No unbounded .* or .+ around alternations (catastrophic backtracking)
# - Risky spans are bounded ({0,N}) to prevent ReDoS
# - \s* and \w+ are acceptable in non-alternation positions
# - \b-anchored to avoid substring matches
# - IGNORECASE compiled in
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFAULT_HIGH_PATTERNS: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = [
# Destructive filesystem operations
(
r"\brm\s+(?:-[frR]{2,}|-[rR]\s+-f|-f\s+-[rR]"
r"|--recursive\s+--force|--force\s+--recursive)\b",
"Recursive force-delete (rm -rf variants)",
DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_RM_RF,
),
(r"\bsudo\s+rm\b", "Privileged file deletion", DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_SUDO_RM),
(r"\bmkfs\.\w+", "Filesystem format command", DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_MKFS),
(r"\bdd\b.{0,100}of=/dev/", "Raw disk write", DET_EXEC_DESTRUCT_DD),
# Code invocation via dynamic interpreters
(r"\beval\s*\(", "Dynamic code evaluation", DET_EXEC_CODE_EVAL),
(r"\bexec\s*\(", "Dynamic code execution", DET_EXEC_CODE_EXEC),
(r"\bos\.system\s*\(", "OS-level command execution", DET_EXEC_CODE_OS_SYSTEM),
(
r"\bsubprocess\.(?:call|run|Popen|check_output|check_call)\s*\(",
"Subprocess invocation",
DET_EXEC_CODE_SUBPROCESS,
),
# Download-and-run
(
r"\bcurl\b[^|]{0,200}\|\s*(?:ba)?sh\b",
"Download and run (curl | sh)",
DET_EXEC_NET_CURL_EXEC,
),
(
r"\bwget\b[^|]{0,200}\|\s*(?:ba)?sh\b",
"Download and run (wget | sh)",
DET_EXEC_NET_WGET_EXEC,
),
]

DEFAULT_MEDIUM_PATTERNS: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = [
# Network access without invocation pipe
(r"\bcurl\b.{0,100}https?://", "HTTP request via curl", DET_EXEC_NET_CURL),
(r"\bwget\b.{0,100}https?://", "Download via wget", DET_EXEC_NET_WGET),
]

# Injection patterns: scanned against ALL fields (invocation + reasoning).
# These are textual attacks targeting instruction-following, not the OS.

DEFAULT_INJECTION_HIGH_PATTERNS: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = [
(
r"\b(?:ignore|disregard|forget|override|bypass)\s+(?:all\s+)?"
r"(?:previous|prior|above)\s+(?:instructions?|prompts?|rules?|directives?)\b",
"Instruction override attempt",
DET_INJECT_OVERRIDE,
),
]

DEFAULT_INJECTION_MEDIUM_PATTERNS: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = [
(
r"\byou\s+are\s+now\s+(?:in\s+)?(?:\w+\s+)?mode\b",
"Mode switching attempt",
DET_INJECT_MODE_SWITCH,
),
(
r"\bpretend\s+(?:you\s+are|to\s+be)\s+(?:a\s+)?different\b",
"Identity manipulation",
DET_INJECT_IDENTITY,
),
]


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# PatternSecurityAnalyzer
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


class PatternSecurityAnalyzer(SecurityAnalyzerBase):
"""Catch dangerous agent actions through deterministic signature scanning.

Use this when you want fast, local, no-network threat detection at the
action boundary. It returns ``SecurityRisk.HIGH``, ``MEDIUM``, or ``LOW``
-- pair it with ``ConfirmRisky`` to decide what gets confirmed.

The key design choice: shell-destructive patterns only scan what the
agent will *execute* (tool arguments), never what it *thought about*
(reasoning text). Injection patterns scan everything, because
"ignore all previous instructions" is dangerous wherever it appears.

Normalization is always on -- invisible characters and fullwidth
substitutions are collapsed before matching.

Example::

from openhands.sdk.security import PatternSecurityAnalyzer, ConfirmRisky

analyzer = PatternSecurityAnalyzer()
policy = ConfirmRisky(threshold=SecurityRisk.MEDIUM)
"""

high_patterns: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = Field(
default_factory=lambda: list(DEFAULT_HIGH_PATTERNS),
description="HIGH patterns scanned against executable fields only",
)
medium_patterns: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = Field(
default_factory=lambda: list(DEFAULT_MEDIUM_PATTERNS),
description="MEDIUM patterns scanned against executable fields only",
)
injection_high_patterns: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = Field(
default_factory=lambda: list(DEFAULT_INJECTION_HIGH_PATTERNS),
description="HIGH patterns scanned against all fields",
)
injection_medium_patterns: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = Field(
default_factory=lambda: list(DEFAULT_INJECTION_MEDIUM_PATTERNS),
description="MEDIUM patterns scanned against all fields",
)

_compiled_high: list[tuple[re.Pattern[str], str, str]] = PrivateAttr(
default_factory=list,
)
_compiled_medium: list[tuple[re.Pattern[str], str, str]] = PrivateAttr(
default_factory=list,
)
_compiled_injection_high: list[tuple[re.Pattern[str], str, str]] = PrivateAttr(
default_factory=list,
)
_compiled_injection_medium: list[tuple[re.Pattern[str], str, str]] = PrivateAttr(
default_factory=list,
)

def model_post_init(self, __context: Any) -> None:
"""Compile regex patterns after model initialization."""
self._compiled_high = [
(re.compile(p, re.IGNORECASE), d, det_id)
for p, d, det_id in self.high_patterns
]
self._compiled_medium = [
(re.compile(p, re.IGNORECASE), d, det_id)
for p, d, det_id in self.medium_patterns
]
self._compiled_injection_high = [
(re.compile(p, re.IGNORECASE), d, det_id)
for p, d, det_id in self.injection_high_patterns
]
self._compiled_injection_medium = [
(re.compile(p, re.IGNORECASE), d, det_id)
for p, d, det_id in self.injection_medium_patterns
]

def security_risk(self, action: ActionEvent) -> SecurityRisk:
"""Evaluate security risk via two-corpus pattern matching."""
exec_content = _normalize(_extract_exec_content(action))
all_content = _normalize(_extract_content(action))

if not exec_content and not all_content:
return SecurityRisk.LOW

# HIGH: patterns on executable fields only
for pattern, _desc, det_id in self._compiled_high:
if pattern.search(exec_content):
logger.debug("Pattern matched: %s -> HIGH", det_id)
return SecurityRisk.HIGH

# HIGH: injection patterns on all fields
for pattern, _desc, det_id in self._compiled_injection_high:
if pattern.search(all_content):
logger.debug("Pattern matched: %s -> HIGH", det_id)
return SecurityRisk.HIGH

# MEDIUM: patterns on executable fields only
for pattern, _desc, det_id in self._compiled_medium:
if pattern.search(exec_content):
logger.debug("Pattern matched: %s -> MEDIUM", det_id)
return SecurityRisk.MEDIUM

# MEDIUM: injection patterns on all fields
for pattern, _desc, det_id in self._compiled_injection_medium:
if pattern.search(all_content):
logger.debug("Pattern matched: %s -> MEDIUM", det_id)
return SecurityRisk.MEDIUM

return SecurityRisk.LOW
Loading
Loading