Skip to content

[18.0][MIG] website_analytics_matomo: Migration to 18.0#1107

Open
ByteMeAsap wants to merge 18 commits intoOCA:18.0from
ByteMeAsap:18.0-mig-website_analytics_matomo
Open

[18.0][MIG] website_analytics_matomo: Migration to 18.0#1107
ByteMeAsap wants to merge 18 commits intoOCA:18.0from
ByteMeAsap:18.0-mig-website_analytics_matomo

Conversation

@ByteMeAsap
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

victor-champonnois and others added 17 commits June 2, 2025 19:21
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: website-15.0/website-15.0-website_analytics_matomo
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/website-15-0/website-15-0-website_analytics_matomo/
Currently translated at 50.0% (6 of 12 strings)

Translation: website-15.0/website-15.0-website_analytics_matomo
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/website-15-0/website-15-0-website_analytics_matomo/it/
Currently translated at 63.1% (12 of 19 strings)

Translation: website-15.0/website-15.0-website_analytics_matomo
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/website-15-0/website-15-0-website_analytics_matomo/de/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: website-16.0/website-16.0-website_analytics_matomo
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/website-16-0/website-16-0-website_analytics_matomo/
Currently translated at 100.0% (19 of 19 strings)

Translation: website-16.0/website-16.0-website_analytics_matomo
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/website-16-0/website-16-0-website_analytics_matomo/it/
@ByteMeAsap ByteMeAsap force-pushed the 18.0-mig-website_analytics_matomo branch 2 times, most recently from 91afb33 to 78e2163 Compare June 2, 2025 16:13
View Fixes

Increase Test Coverage
@ByteMeAsap ByteMeAsap force-pushed the 18.0-mig-website_analytics_matomo branch from 78e2163 to 4f087b1 Compare June 2, 2025 16:23
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2025

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Oct 5, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Nov 9, 2025
@legalsylvain
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hi @ByteMeAsap. could you reopen ?

I use this module in production, and it works like a charm.

@victor-champonnois : could you review this PR, as you are the original author ?

thanks !

@ByteMeAsap
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

hey @legalsylvain , can you please guide me on how to reopen this?

@legalsylvain
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@OCA/website-maintainers could you reopen ?

@hbrunn hbrunn reopened this Mar 18, 2026
@hbrunn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

hbrunn commented Mar 18, 2026

@legalsylvain if this works like a charm for you, you should review it

#1133 seems interesting to review+integrate too

@legalsylvain
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@legalsylvain if this works like a charm for you, you should review it

It is not possible, when it's closed. but now, it's possible.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@legalsylvain legalsylvain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Used in production. Thanks for porting this tool.

One thing :

  • this module implement the "integrate js file" way. As a result, we have full information in matomo, but such implementation is blocked by tools that preserves user privacy (Like uBlock Origin). As a result, all people using such tool will be ignored, in matomo, and user count will be wrong. That's a pity.

  • Another way to implement is to use the "matomo API" way. (here Odoo calls directly matomo api). As a result, user count is correct. (but there will be less information in matomo like no duration of user in each page, etc...)

What do you think ?
Could you just add a ROADMAP.md file to mention the interest to implement the second way ?

Thanks !

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Mar 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.