Conversation
- Analyzed Forge's multi-agent local orchestration and skill system. - Analyzed OpenSwarm's Linear/Discord integration and vector memory. - Compared Issue-based vs Direct orchestration approaches. - Identified actionable ideas to borrow for Cortex. Co-authored-by: NickStr11 <37849063+NickStr11@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
NickStr11
deleted the
research/competitor-analysis-2026-02-26-16540854472689688700
branch
1 participant
This PR adds a comprehensive research report comparing Cortex with two similar projects: Forge and OpenSwarm. The report covers their architectural designs, orchestration strategies, and highlights features that could be integrated into Cortex, such as a skills system, vector-based memory, and an escalation protocol.
Fixes #39
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16540854472689688700 started by @NickStr11