replace yapf reference with instruction to use 'ruff format'

[sjvrijn]

Checklist before requesting a review

• I have read the contribution guidelines
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• [ ] All user facing changes have been added to CHANGELOG.md

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

List of related issues or pull requests**

Refs:

• Is yapf reference in README.dev.md outdated? #588

Describe the changes made in this pull request

Removed the reference to yapf for formatting code, and replaced it with an instruction to use ruff format instead.

[sverhoeven]

Nice work, making things more consistent.

In README.dev.md the ruff commands are shown with ..
In template/{% if AddPreCommit %}.githooks{% endif %}/pre-commit and template/{% if HasWorkflows %}.github{% endif %}/workflows/{% if AddGitHubActionBuild %}build.yml{% endif %}.jinja the ruff commands are run without ..

Would be nice to be consistent with the commands by either using ruff check . or ruff check everywhere.

nitpick

When I do ruff format . I get

warning: The following rules have been removed and ignoring them has no effect:
    - ANN101
    - ANN102

warning: The following rule may cause conflicts when used with the formatter: `COM812`. To avoid unexpected behavior, we recommend disabling this rule, either by removing it from the `lint.select` or `lint.extend-select` configuration, or adding it to the `lint.ignore` configuration.
4 files left unchanged

Might be nice to get rid of those warnings. This is with ruff v0.14.5.

[sjvrijn]

@sverhoeven Thanks for the suggestions! I've updated the ruff calls to use . explicitly, and I've included COM812 (missing trailing commas) in the ignore list, since ruff format already fixes that.

The warnings on ANN101 & 102 were already removed in a previous PR, I think you got those because copier uses the latest tag/release by default. My bad for not the relevant copier command to use when testing to the PR in the first place 😅

copier copy --vcs-ref 588-replace-yapf-with-ruff-format https://github.com/nlesc/python-template test_package