Skip to content

Conversation

@mo-RowanMcL
Copy link
Contributor

@mo-RowanMcL mo-RowanMcL commented Dec 9, 2025

Most changes are 1-1 with CrIS or HIRAS processing already present.

I have not created a CxWriter test, is this a necessary step here?

sith run showing correct extraction: https://cylchub/services/cylc-review/taskjobs/rowan.mclaughlin/?suite=sith%2Fhiras2_auxdocs_merge

@mo-RowanMcL mo-RowanMcL changed the title Add HIRAS2 observations Add HIRAS2 observation type for use in JOPA Dec 9, 2025
@mo-RowanMcL mo-RowanMcL marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2026 10:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@ctgh ctgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this. If it's not too much trouble to add Cx and Varobs writer tests that would be good, just to make sure everything is covered.

@mo-RowanMcL
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for adding this. If it's not too much trouble to add Cx and Varobs writer tests that would be good, just to make sure everything is covered.

Cx and Varobs writer tests now complete.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ctgh ctgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the new tests. Looks good!

@ctgh ctgh merged commit 7be405c into develop Jan 12, 2026
6 checks passed
@ctgh ctgh deleted the feature/add_hiras2 branch January 12, 2026 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants