ci: use official Claude PR review comments

[MapleEve]

Summary

• Configure the automatic PR review workflow to use anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 without passing a user-owned GitHub token.
• Remove github_token: secrets.GH_TOKEN, GH_TOKEN env export, and gh pr comment tool access from the no-interaction PR review path.
• Keep review feedback on the official Claude Code Action / Claude GitHub App integration path. If the Claude GitHub App is not installed for a repository, the workflow should fail instead of posting comments as the repository owner.
• Use use_sticky_comment and exclude previous automated comments from context to reduce stale self-feedback.

Verification

• YAML parses successfully.
• git diff --check passes.
• BetterAINote targeted CI integration test passes: bun test src/tests/ci-integrations.test.ts.
• Wrong comments previously posted as MapleEve were removed from the PRs.

Important

This PR intentionally does not use secrets.GH_TOKEN for PR review comments. Official Claude-authored comments require the Claude GitHub App integration for the repository.

[github-actions]

👍 @MapleEve

Thank you for raising your pull request and contributing to voscript.
Please make sure you have followed our contributing guidelines. We will review it as soon as possible.
If you encounter any problems, please feel free to connect with us.
非常感谢您提出拉取请求并为 voscript 做出贡献，请确保您已经遵循了我们的贡献指南，我们会尽快审查它。
如果您遇到任何问题，请随时与我们联系。

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.18%. Comparing base (3a9155e) to head (3434f84).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #31   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.18%   91.18%           
=======================================
  Files          76       76           
  Lines        3016     3016           
=======================================
  Hits         2750     2750           
  Misses        266      266           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	91.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the Claude PR review GitHub Actions workflow to use the official anthropics/claude-code-action PR-review pattern, aiming to let Claude post both a top-level summary and inline comments directly on PRs without using a personal token.

Changes:

• Switch trigger to pull_request-only (adds reopened, removes workflow_dispatch) and tighten job gating to non-draft PRs from trusted author associations.
• Replace the previous shell-based “summary fallback” with anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 using track_progress and a prompt that instructs Claude to post comments via gh + MCP inline-comment tooling.
• Stop passing a personal GH_TOKEN secret into the workflow.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[github-actions]

❤️ Great PR @MapleEve ❤️

The growth of project is inseparable from user feedback and contribution, thanks for your contribution!
项目的成长离不开用户反馈和贡献，感谢您的贡献!