Skip to content

Conversation

@nicoledow
Copy link
Contributor

@nicoledow nicoledow commented Jan 2, 2024

Items Addressed

#142

Review Questions

For both this PR and #145, I did not update the version number. I wasn't sure if ReadME updates warrant a new version?

Author Checklist

  • Add unit test(s)
  • Update documentation (if necessary)
  • Update version in version.rb following versioning guidelines

@nicoledow nicoledow linked an issue Jan 2, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@nicoledow nicoledow marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2024 21:39
@nicoledow nicoledow requested a review from chawes13 as a code owner January 4, 2024 21:39
Copy link
Contributor

@chawes13 chawes13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm generally in favor of every commit to main == new release, even if it's just documentation. Can you increment the patch version?

README.md Outdated
# Creates app/decanters/trip_decanter.rb:
class TripDecanter < Decanter::Base
input :id, :integer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is included automatically?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean the id parser, right? You're correct - removed from this example as well as the other ✔️

README.md Outdated
end
```

See more details on using custom parsers [here](#custom-parsers).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not a huge fan of "here" links (https://granicus.com/blog/why-click-here-links-are-bad/ has some general rationale). An alternative could be something like, "Learn more about using custom parsers."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the link. Done!

@nicoledow nicoledow requested a review from chawes13 January 8, 2024 21:33
@chawes13 chawes13 merged commit 5234600 into main Jan 11, 2024
@chawes13 chawes13 deleted the 142-only-one-generator-is-documented branch January 11, 2024 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Only one generator is documented

3 participants