add support for Sixel

[IanButterworth]

I think this is ok as a direct dep?
Also, needs testing.

If REFERENCETESTS_SIXEL=1

[oxinabox]

Sixel actually adds a 50 direct dependencies, including ImageCore, which we currently use a hack to avoid depending on directly.
With that said maybe we should just depend on it (and ImageCore and XImageInTerm) directly,
making maintenance and use easier.

If we are depending on it directly, i think we don't need to use a enviroment variable to decide if to use it or not, and can just use Sixel.is_sixel_supported() and if so always use it. Its always better, no?

[IanButterworth]

Unfortunately that returns false inside the Pkg.test worker in a local terminal where it otherwise returns true.

[oxinabox]

Oh thats annoying we should open an issue on Sixel.jl about that

[IanButterworth]

Attempts to fix it here JuliaIO/Sixel.jl#29

Pkg discussion about it here JuliaLang/Pkg.jl#3185 (comment)

[MasonProtter]

I really want this and I'm fine with setting an env variable to get it FWIW.

[oxinabox]

I propose the following things:

• Fix CI
• Add this to docs/readme
• Open issue to do automatically once we workout how (cross link to the julia issue)
• Remove @lazy loads from modules that are already loaded by Sixel.jl and if that is all of them remove dependency on LazyModules.jl

[IanButterworth]

Please feel free to take this over. It's not a high priority for me right now.

[oxinabox]

@MasonProtter are you interested in doing these things?

[MasonProtter]

Yeah I can look into it during the week. Ill let you know the if I can take it on.

[MasonProtter]

Superseded by #136