Monerh A

[Miuroro]

No description provided.

[mvcatsifma]

Solid submission. The code structure is clean, the logic is organized clearly, and the required menu functionality appears to be implemented.

Main improvement areas:

• The project currently does not run due to a package/dependency issue partly related to the starter setup.
• Invalid grade values such as 150 or -5 are rejected by setGrade(), but the input loop still continues to the next module instead of asking the user to retry the input.
• The average calculation currently includes ungraded modules (0 values), which can unfairly lower the student’s average score.
• Public methods are missing Javadoc comments.

For future assignments:

• Always run and test the application before submission.
• Strengthen validation logic around user input.
• Add Javadoc for public methods and utility classes.

Good overall effort and solid progress for Week 1.