Skip to content

Conversation

@twalsh-ebi
Copy link
Contributor

@twalsh-ebi twalsh-ebi commented Dec 16, 2025

Requirements

  • Filling out the template is required. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be efficiently reviewed may be rejected.
  • Please consider which branch this is to be submitted against. This is usually obvious, however if it is to be applied to both a release branch nn and master then please submit it against postreleasefix/nn and let us merge it into to the two branches.

Description

This PR would update the way the synteny view handles data, obtaining a unique set of synteny regions in the main chromosome, and then ordering these in such a way that they are 'threaded' along it.

It would also update the info box shown when a chromosome lacks synteny regions in the selected other species.

Views affected

This PR changes code used in all synteny views.

However, most synteny views should be essentially unaffected.

It is intended to fix issues with the Human self-synteny view, mainly due to challenges working with syntenic regions that may connect different regions of the same genome, possibly even two regions of the same chromosome.

Synteny views affected

Example of synteny view affected by this PR:

Example image of Human self-synteny view for chromosome 1 on sandbox:
e116_sandbox_human_self_synteny_chr1

Example image of Human self-synteny view for chromosome 1 on staging:
e116_staging_human_self_synteny_chr1

Synteny views unaffected

The following synteny examples should be consistent between sandbox and staging, though the rendering order of highlighted regions or the placement of other chromosomes in the synteny view may differ in some cases.

Vertebrates

Example image of Human vs Chimpanzee synteny view for chromosome 2 on sandbox:
e116_sandbox_human_chimp_synteny_chr2

Example image of Human vs Chimpanzee synteny view for chromosome 2 on staging:
e116_staging_human_chimp_synteny_chr2

Plants

Metazoa

Possible complications

None expected, though further checks are needed.

Merge conflicts

None detected

Related JIRA Issues (EBI developers only)

  • ENSCOMPARASW-7059

@twalsh-ebi twalsh-ebi force-pushed the tweak/synteny_view_data branch from b4c35dd to 5e0ea25 Compare January 17, 2026 13:08
@twalsh-ebi twalsh-ebi marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2026 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant