Skip to content

Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux)#3736

Open
olyson wants to merge 3 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3722
Open

Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux)#3736
olyson wants to merge 3 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3722

Conversation

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor

@olyson olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

Description of changes

Add documentation for dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: None

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Resolves #3722
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? Yes. Yes.

Testing performed, if any:
Built and viewed documentation locally.

@olyson olyson added this to the cesm3.0.0 release branch tag milestone Feb 3, 2026
@olyson olyson requested a review from slevis-lmwg February 3, 2026 19:56
@olyson olyson added next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. bfb bit-for-bit size: small docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) labels Feb 3, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @olyson! I did not go to the code to confirm the accuracy of the equations, but nothing stood out as an obvious (to me) mistake, so I'm approving.

I noticed that you presented the new equations without saying anything about how this changes dew formation. Is dew formation explained anywhere? Is the connection to dew formation too tenuous to draw the link explicitly? Mainly I'm curious, and I'm fine with whatever you decide.

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

Thanks @olyson! I did not go to the code to confirm the accuracy of the equations, but nothing stood out as an obvious (to me) mistake, so I'm approving.

I noticed that you presented the new equations without saying anything about how this changes dew formation. Is dew formation explained anywhere? Is the connection to dew formation too tenuous to draw the link explicitly? Mainly I'm curious, and I'm fine with whatever you decide.

Actually, yes, that is a good idea. I will ex;plicitly link this to the RRTMGP error issue with a comment.

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

@slevis-lmwg , I have added the comment and fixed the numbering.

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Feb 5, 2026

@samsrabin can you bring this to b4b-dev?

@wwieder wwieder removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bfb bit-for-bit docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) size: small

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants