-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Fix database index and table drop errors #9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix database index and table drop errors #9
Conversation
The migration was failing with PostgreSQL error 42P01 (undefined_table) because ALTER TABLE fails when the table doesn't exist, even with IF EXISTS on the constraint. Changes: - Remove ALTER TABLE statement that fails on missing table - Use DROP TABLE IF EXISTS ... CASCADE instead - CASCADE automatically handles dependent constraints This makes the migration idempotent and safe to run regardless of whether the admin_whitelist table exists.
Integrates drizzle-typebox to eliminate duplicate type definitions between Drizzle ORM schemas and Elysia API validation. Changes: - Add drizzle-typebox@0.3.3 dependency - Create server/db/typebox-schemas.ts with schema converters - Add spread() and spreads() utilities for picking schema fields - Export TypeBox schemas from db/index.ts - Update users route to demonstrate the pattern Benefits: - Define schemas once in Drizzle, use for DB and API validation - Auto-generated OpenAPI docs match database schema - Type-safe frontend via Eden Treaty - Reduced code duplication and drift See: https://elysiajs.com/integrations/drizzle
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughAdds drizzle-typebox integration for centralized, type-safe validation schemas. Introduces a new TypeBox schema module deriving schemas from Drizzle ORM table definitions with utility functions for field extraction. Updates database exports to include the new module, modifies a migration to use CASCADE for cleanup, and refactors the users route to use the centralized UserProfileUpdateSchema. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| export function spread<T extends TObject>( | ||
| schema: T, | ||
| keys: (keyof T["properties"])[], | ||
| ): Partial<T["properties"]> { | ||
| const result: Partial<T["properties"]> = {}; | ||
| for (const key of keys) { | ||
| if (key in schema.properties) { | ||
| result[key] = schema.properties[key]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Silent Failure in spread Utility
The spread function silently ignores keys that do not exist in the schema's properties. This can lead to subtle bugs if a caller misspells a key or requests a non-existent property, as the function will simply omit it from the result without any warning or error.
Recommendation:
Consider throwing an error or logging a warning when a requested key is not found in the schema's properties. For example:
for (const key of keys) {
if (key in schema.properties) {
result[key] = schema.properties[key];
} else {
throw new Error(`Key '${String(key)}' not found in schema properties.`);
}
}This will make debugging easier and ensure that schema construction is intentional and correct.
| return { user: updatedUser }; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security Risk: Potential Exposure of Sensitive User Fields
The response { user: updatedUser } may expose sensitive fields from the user object, such as internal IDs, authentication tokens, or other confidential attributes. To mitigate this, ensure that only non-sensitive, client-safe fields are included in the response. For example:
return { user: filterUserForClient(updatedUser) };Where filterUserForClient is a utility that strips sensitive fields before returning the user object.
Summary of ChangesHello @Dexploarer, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the application's schema management by integrating Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryThis PR introduces drizzle-typebox integration to eliminate schema duplication between database and API validation layers, and fixes a database migration error. The main changes include adding the The implementation creates a single source of truth for schemas by generating TypeBox validation schemas directly from Drizzle ORM definitions. This follows the project's architecture principle of reducing code duplication and maintaining consistency between database and API contracts. The Important Files Changed
Confidence score: 4/5
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Elysia as "Elysia Server"
participant TypeBox as "TypeBox Schemas"
participant Drizzle as "Drizzle ORM"
participant DB as "Database"
Note over User,DB: Drizzle-TypeBox Integration Setup
User->>Elysia: "Install drizzle-typebox dependency"
Elysia->>TypeBox: "Add createInsertSchema/createSelectSchema utilities"
Note over TypeBox,Drizzle: Schema Conversion Process
TypeBox->>Drizzle: "Import Drizzle schemas (users, projects, assets, etc.)"
Drizzle-->>TypeBox: "Return schema definitions"
TypeBox->>TypeBox: "Convert to TypeBox schemas with createInsertSchema/createSelectSchema"
TypeBox->>TypeBox: "Add spread() and spreads() utilities for field selection"
Note over User,DB: User Profile Update Flow
User->>Elysia: "POST /api/users/complete-profile with profile data"
Elysia->>TypeBox: "Validate request body using UserProfileUpdateSchema"
TypeBox-->>Elysia: "Schema validation result"
Elysia->>Drizzle: "Update user profile in database"
Drizzle->>DB: "Execute UPDATE query"
DB-->>Drizzle: "Return updated user data"
Drizzle-->>Elysia: "Return updated user object"
Elysia-->>User: "Return success response with updated user"
Note over User,DB: Database Migration Fix
User->>DB: "Run migration 0032_fix_schema_drift.sql"
DB->>DB: "DROP INDEX IF EXISTS idx_admin_whitelist_wallet"
DB->>DB: "DROP TABLE IF EXISTS admin_whitelist CASCADE"
DB-->>User: "Migration completed successfully"
Note over TypeBox: Export schemas from db/index.ts for centralized access
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
5 files reviewed, 2 comments
| // Add email format validation | ||
| email: t.Optional(t.String({ format: "email" })), | ||
| // Ensure wallet addresses are lowercase | ||
| walletAddress: t.Optional(t.String({ minLength: 42, maxLength: 42 })), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
logic: wallet address validation assumes Ethereum addresses (42 chars), but comment mentions lowercase while validation only checks length. Should the walletAddress validation include a pattern check for hexadecimal format and enforce lowercase, or are non-Ethereum addresses also supported?
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: apps/core/server/db/typebox-schemas.ts
Line: 79:79
Comment:
**logic:** wallet address validation assumes Ethereum addresses (42 chars), but comment mentions lowercase while validation only checks length. Should the walletAddress validation include a pattern check for hexadecimal format and enforce lowercase, or are non-Ethereum addresses also supported?
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| /** Schema for user profile updates */ | ||
| export const UserProfileUpdateSchema = t.Object({ | ||
| displayName: t.String({ minLength: 1, maxLength: 255 }), | ||
| email: t.String({ format: "email" }), | ||
| discordUsername: t.Optional(t.String({ maxLength: 255 })), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
style: UserProfileUpdateSchema is manually defined instead of using createInsertSchema with field selection - this creates potential schema drift if the users table changes
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: apps/core/server/db/typebox-schemas.ts
Line: 85:90
Comment:
**style:** UserProfileUpdateSchema is manually defined instead of using createInsertSchema with field selection - this creates potential schema drift if the users table changes
<sub>Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!</sub>
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| /** Schema for inserting a new user */ | ||
| export const UserInsertSchema = createInsertSchema(users, { | ||
| // Add email format validation | ||
| email: t.Optional(t.String({ format: "email" })), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: TypeBox email format validation is silently skipped due to missing FormatRegistry.Set("email", ...) call.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High
🔍 Detailed Analysis
TypeBox's Value.Check silently skips email format validation for schemas like UserProfileUpdateSchema because FormatRegistry.Set("email", ...) is only called in test files and not in the application code. This allows invalid email strings (e.g., "invalid-email", "test@") to pass validation, be accepted by the API, and potentially saved to the database, leading to data integrity issues and silent validation failures.
💡 Suggested Fix
Add FormatRegistry.Set("email", ...) and other necessary format registrations (e.g., "uuid") to typebox-schemas.ts before exporting the schemas.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: apps/core/server/db/typebox-schemas.ts#L77
Potential issue: TypeBox's `Value.Check` silently skips email format validation for
schemas like `UserProfileUpdateSchema` because `FormatRegistry.Set("email", ...)` is
only called in test files and not in the application code. This allows invalid email
strings (e.g., "invalid-email", "test@") to pass validation, be accepted by the API, and
potentially saved to the database, leading to data integrity issues and silent
validation failures.
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 3549656
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a solid enhancement, introducing drizzle-typebox to unify schema validation, which significantly improves maintainability by reducing code duplication. The fix to the database migration using DROP TABLE ... CASCADE is also a great improvement for idempotency and robustness. My review includes a few suggestions to further refine these changes, such as making the SQL migration script more concise, improving wallet address validation, and ensuring consistency in type exports.
| -- Drop the index if it exists (safe even if table doesn't exist) | ||
| DROP INDEX IF EXISTS "idx_admin_whitelist_wallet"; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| // Ensure wallet addresses are lowercase | ||
| walletAddress: t.Optional(t.String({ minLength: 42, maxLength: 42 })), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validation for walletAddress could be more robust. The current implementation only checks for length. To better align with the comment "Ensure wallet addresses are lowercase" and to properly validate the format, consider using a regex pattern. This will enforce the 0x prefix, hexadecimal characters, and lowercase requirement in a single rule.
| // Ensure wallet addresses are lowercase | |
| walletAddress: t.Optional(t.String({ minLength: 42, maxLength: 42 })), | |
| // Ensure wallet addresses are lowercase and in the correct format | |
| walletAddress: t.Optional(t.String({ pattern: "^0x[a-f0-9]{40}$" })), |
| export type UserInsert = Static<typeof UserInsertSchema>; | ||
| export type UserSelect = Static<typeof UserSelectSchema>; | ||
| export type ProjectInsert = Static<typeof ProjectInsertSchema>; | ||
| export type ProjectSelect = Static<typeof ProjectSelectSchema>; | ||
| export type AssetInsert = Static<typeof AssetInsertSchema>; | ||
| export type AssetSelect = Static<typeof AssetSelectSchema>; | ||
| export type ApiKeyInsert = Static<typeof ApiKeyInsertSchema>; | ||
| export type ApiKeySelect = Static<typeof ApiKeySelectSchema>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's an inconsistency in the exported types. While schemas for ActivityLog and Prompt are defined, their corresponding static types (ActivityLogInsert, ActivityLogSelect, PromptInsert, PromptSelect) are missing from this type exports section. For consistency with the other schemas in this file, these types should also be exported.
| export type UserInsert = Static<typeof UserInsertSchema>; | |
| export type UserSelect = Static<typeof UserSelectSchema>; | |
| export type ProjectInsert = Static<typeof ProjectInsertSchema>; | |
| export type ProjectSelect = Static<typeof ProjectSelectSchema>; | |
| export type AssetInsert = Static<typeof AssetInsertSchema>; | |
| export type AssetSelect = Static<typeof AssetSelectSchema>; | |
| export type ApiKeyInsert = Static<typeof ApiKeyInsertSchema>; | |
| export type ApiKeySelect = Static<typeof ApiKeySelectSchema>; | |
| export type UserInsert = Static<typeof UserInsertSchema>; | |
| export type UserSelect = Static<typeof UserSelectSchema>; | |
| export type ProjectInsert = Static<typeof ProjectInsertSchema>; | |
| export type ProjectSelect = Static<typeof ProjectSelectSchema>; | |
| export type AssetInsert = Static<typeof AssetInsertSchema>; | |
| export type AssetSelect = Static<typeof AssetSelectSchema>; | |
| export type ApiKeyInsert = Static<typeof ApiKeyInsertSchema>; | |
| export type ApiKeySelect = Static<typeof ApiKeySelectSchema>; | |
| export type ActivityLogInsert = Static<typeof ActivityLogInsertSchema>; | |
| export type ActivityLogSelect = Static<typeof ActivityLogSelectSchema>; | |
| export type PromptInsert = Static<typeof PromptInsertSchema>; | |
| export type PromptSelect = Static<typeof PromptSelectSchema>; |
PR Type
Enhancement, Bug fix
Description
Add drizzle-typebox integration for unified schema validation
Fix database migration error 42P01 with CASCADE clause
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
typebox-schemas.ts
Create drizzle-typebox schema conversion utilitiesapps/core/server/db/typebox-schemas.ts
selection
activity logs, and prompts
index.ts
Export TypeBox schemas from db moduleapps/core/server/db/index.ts
users.ts
Use drizzle-typebox schema in users routeapps/core/server/routes/users.ts
package.json
Add drizzle-typebox dependencyapps/core/package.json
0032_fix_schema_drift.sql
Fix migration error 42P01 with CASCADEapps/core/server/db/migrations/0032_fix_schema_drift.sql
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Infrastructure
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.