GHCi scripts for standalone execution and Markdown documentation.
scripths lets you write .ghci scripts with dependency management and run them as standalone programs — or embed executable Haskell code blocks in Markdown files and evaluate them notebook-style with captured output.
- Standalone
.ghciexecution — Run GHCi scripts directly from the command line, with automatic dependency. - Cabal metadata directives — Declare
build-depends,default-extensions, andghc-optionsinline using-- cabal:comments. - Markdown notebooks — Execute Haskell code blocks inside Markdown files and render the output back into the document as block quotes.
- Smart GHCi rendering — Multi-line definitions are automatically wrapped in
:{/:}blocks, and IO binds / Template Haskell splices are handled correctly as individual statements.
cabal install scripthsscripths [-o FILE | --output=FILE] [-p DIR | --package DIR]... [--no-local-project] <script>
When -o / --output is provided for Markdown files, the result is written to that path. Otherwise it is printed to stdout. The file extension determines the mode. .ghci / hs files are parsed and executed as a standalone GHCi script. .md / .markdown files are processed as a notebook with captured output.
Requires GHC and cabal-install on your PATH.
Create a file example.ghci:
double :: Int -> Int
double = (*2)
-- cabal: build-depends: text
:set -XOverloadedStrings
import qualified Data.Text as T
T.take 10 "hello"
double 5Run it:
scripths example.ghciCreate a file notebook.md:
# My Analysis
Some introductory prose.
```haskell
print (5 + 5)
```
Define some values:
```haskell
x = 10
y = 20
```
We can then add the values in the next block and
the output is embeded below.
```haskell
x + y
```Run it and write the results to a new file:
scripths -o output.md notebook.mdEach Haskell code block is evaluated in order, and its output is inserted into the Markdown as a block quote beneath the code fence.
You can declare dependencies, language extensions, and GHC options directly inside your scripts using -- cabal: comments:
-- cabal: build-depends: text, containers
-- cabal: default-extensions: OverloadedStrings, TypeApplications
-- cabal: ghc-options: -Wall
By default build-depends resolve from Hackage. To build a script or notebook
against a local checkout instead — e.g. to document a library version that
only exists on a branch — there are two mechanisms.
If a script/notebook lives inside a cabal project and a build-depends names that
project's package (or one of its sub-libraries, pkg:sublib), scripths builds
against the local working tree automatically — so documenting your own repo just
works:
scripths -o docs/MANUAL.md docs/base/MANUAL.mdPass --no-local-project to suppress this and resolve every build-depends from
Hackage instead — e.g. to verify the doc's examples against the released
version of your package rather than the working tree. Explicit --package dirs
are unaffected.
Point at another local checkout (a sibling package, or a sub-library project).
DIR must be a package root (contain a .cabal); it is resolved to an absolute
path at the invocation site, so nothing machine-specific is committed to the
shared document. Repeatable.
scripths --package ../granite -o out.md in.mdTo pin a pushed commit/tag reproducibly (and commit the pin into the shared
document), declare a source-repository-package directive as
<location> <ref> [subdir]:
-- cabal: source-repository-package: https://github.com/owner/repo v1.2.3
-- cabal: source-repository-package: https://github.com/owner/mono abc123 sub/dir
scripths writes these as source-repository-package stanzas in the generated
cabal.project. Use a local checkout (above) for an unpushed branch, and a git
pin for a pushed, reproducible reference.