-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
Adds process_tags to live debugger payloads #3580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: PROFeNoM <alexandre.choura@datadoghq.com>
|
Benchmarks [ tracer ]Benchmark execution time: 2026-01-20 12:41:12 Comparing candidate commit 58d8f00 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 189 metrics, 1 unstable metrics. scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching1
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3580 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 61.92% 61.92%
=======================================
Files 140 140
Lines 13309 13309
Branches 1762 1762
=======================================
Hits 8241 8241
Misses 4278 4278
Partials 790 790 Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
923101a to
3ce0af9
Compare
793e2b6 to
58d8f00
Compare
This PR implements this RFC for dynamic instrumentation.
Add process_tags to dynamic instrumentation payload.
This PR comes with this libdatadog PR: DataDog/libdatadog#1452 which justifies the temporary bump of libdatadog (to show that it works)