feat: implement remote configuration caching mechanism

[gogusarov]

Motivation

Support remote configuration caching mechanism according to the RFC

Changes

Test instructions

Checklist

• Tested locally
• Tested on staging
• Added unit tests for this change.
• Added e2e/integration tests for this change.
• Updated documentation and/or relevant AGENTS.md file

[datadog-prod-us1-6]

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI or with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 5 Tests failed

remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › async from rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts     (Fix with Cursor)

remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 async

[chromium] › rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 › remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › async 

    Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

    Expected: 1
    Received: 100

      17 |       await waitForRemoteConfigurationToBeApplied(page)
...

remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › bundle from rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts     (Fix with Cursor)

remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 bundle

[chromium] › rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 › remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › bundle 

    Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

    Expected: 1
    Received: 100

      17 |       await waitForRemoteConfigurationToBeApplied(page)
...

remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › npm from rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts     (Fix with Cursor)

remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 npm

[chromium] › rum/remoteConfiguration.scenario.ts:8:13 › remote configuration › should be fetched and applied › npm 

    Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

    Expected: 1
    Received: 100

      17 |       await waitForRemoteConfigurationToBeApplied(page)
...

View all

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 13884a7 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[gogusarov]

@mormubis would it be ok to leave metrics keys the way they currently are (success / missing / failure) or should they be exactly the same as in you RFC (hit/miss/error)