Docs[EARLY DRAFT]: Tool router docs #2218
Conversation
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR. Below is my feedback organized by category: Review Checklist:
Major Issues Found1. CRITICAL: Strikethrough Text Throughout DocumentationMultiple files contain inappropriate strikethrough formatting ( Files affected:
Action needed: Remove all 2. Inconsistent API Method NamesThe documentation uses inconsistent method names across examples: Issues found:
Action needed: Standardize to 3. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
Grammar and Style Issues4. Title Case ViolationsSeveral page titles don't follow the style guide requirement for title case: Issues found:
5. Missing Articles and Grammar Issues
6. Inconsistent Terminology
Content and Structure Issues7. Code Example InconsistenciesIn
8. Missing Context
Navigation and Structure9. Good Structure OverallThe navigation structure in 10. Helpful Cross-linkingMost files include appropriate "Next steps" sections with relevant links, following the style guide's cross-linking requirements. RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Positive Aspects
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and follows most style guidelines well. The primary issues are formatting artifacts and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR. Below is my feedback organized by category: Review Checklist:
Major Issues Found1. CRITICAL: Strikethrough Text Throughout DocumentationMultiple files contain inappropriate strikethrough formatting ( Files affected:
Action needed: Remove all 2. Inconsistent API Method NamesThe documentation uses inconsistent method names across examples: Issues found:
Action needed: Standardize to 3. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
Grammar and Style Issues4. Title Case ViolationsSeveral page titles don't follow the style guide requirement for title case: Issues found:
5. Missing Articles and Grammar Issues
6. Inconsistent Terminology
Content and Structure Issues7. Code Example InconsistenciesIn
8. Missing Context
Navigation and Structure9. Good Structure OverallThe navigation structure in 10. Helpful Cross-linkingMost files include appropriate "Next steps" sections with relevant links, following the style guide's cross-linking requirements. RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Positive Aspects
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and follows most style guidelines well. The primary issues are formatting artifacts and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR. Below is my feedback organized by category: Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. CRITICAL: Strikethrough Text Throughout DocumentationMultiple files contain inappropriate strikethrough formatting ( Files affected:
Action needed: Remove all 2. Inconsistent API Method NamesThe documentation uses inconsistent method names across examples: Issues found:
Action needed: Standardize to 3. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
4. Code Example Bug: Wrong Connection RequestIn Grammar and Style Issues5. Title Case ViolationsSeveral page titles don't follow the style guide requirement for title case: Issues found:
6. Missing Articles and Grammar Issues
7. Inconsistent Terminology
Content and Structure Issues8. Missing Context
Navigation and Structure9. Good Structure OverallThe navigation structure in 10. Helpful Cross-linkingMost files include appropriate "Next steps" sections with relevant links, following the style guide's cross-linking requirements. RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Positive Aspects
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and follows most style guidelines well. The primary issues are formatting artifacts and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR. Below is my feedback organized by category: Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. CRITICAL: Strikethrough Text Throughout DocumentationMultiple files contain inappropriate strikethrough formatting ( Files affected:
Action needed: Remove all 2. Code Example Bug: Wrong Connection RequestIn 3. Inconsistent API Method NamesThe documentation uses inconsistent method names across examples: Issues found:
Action needed: Standardize to 4. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
Grammar and Style Issues5. Title Case ViolationsSeveral page titles don't follow the style guide requirement for title case: Issues found:
6. Missing Articles and Grammar Issues
7. Inconsistent Terminology
Content and Structure Issues8. Missing Context
Navigation and Structure9. Good Structure OverallThe navigation structure in 10. Helpful Cross-linkingMost files include appropriate "Next steps" sections with relevant links, following the style guide's cross-linking requirements. RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Positive Aspects
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and follows most style guidelines well. The primary issues are formatting artifacts and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
| { | ||
| "organization": "composio", | ||
| "version": "0.116.0" | ||
| "version": "3.20.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: Suspicious major version jump in Fern configuration
The Fern framework version jumped from "0.116.0" to "3.20.0" - a massive change from a 0.x pre-release version to a 3.x version. This is a significant infrastructure change that could affect how documentation is built and rendered. In a PR focused on "Tool router docs" content, this unexplained version change appears to be accidentally committed, possibly from a different branch or testing environment.
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Suspicious Infrastructure ChangeIn 6. Reference Without ContextIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
The Please review and fix the vulnerabilities. You can try running: pnpm audit --fix --prodAudit output |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. Suspicious Infrastructure ChangeIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. Suspicious Infrastructure ChangeIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
| description: "Discover the right tools for your agent" | ||
| keywords: "tool router" | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: Empty documentation pages linked in site navigation
Several documentation pages contain only frontmatter with no actual content, but are actively linked in the navigation via fern/docs.yml. Users clicking on "Tool Search", "Tool Execution and Workbench", or "Using with MCP Clients" in the navigation will see blank pages. These appear to be placeholder files from an early draft that were added to the navigation prematurely.
Additional Locations (2)
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. Suspicious Infrastructure ChangeIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. Suspicious Infrastructure ChangeIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like 8. Significant Fern Version ChangeIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like 8. Significant Fern Version ChangeIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like 8. Significant Fern Version ChangeIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
|
Claude finished @Sushmithamallesh's task —— View job Claude is working on @Sushmithamallesh's task Documentation Review for Tool Router V2 DocsI've completed a comprehensive review of this documentation PR focusing on grammar, spelling, clarity, readability, consistency, tone, and adherence to the style guide. Review Tasks:
Major Issues Found1. Code Example Bug: Incorrect Authentication FlowIn The code has a logical bug where it calls
This will always timeout because the user hasn't had time to visit the URL and authenticate. The code should either:
2. Broken Reference LinksSeveral internal links reference non-existent pages: Files affected:
3. Title Case ViolationIn 4. API Method InconsistencyIn Minor Issues Found5. Reference Without ContextIn 6. Duplicate Snippet FilesFiles 7. Empty Documentation PagesFiles like 8. Significant Fern Version ChangeIn Positive AspectsThe documentation demonstrates several strengths:
RecommendationsHigh Priority (Fix before merging):
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
Style Guide AdherenceThe documentation generally follows the style guide well:
The documentation provides solid coverage of Tool Router capabilities and successfully guides users from basic understanding to advanced implementation patterns. The primary issues are a critical code bug and consistency problems that should be straightforward to address. |
No description provided.