-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Mirror of 390 #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
949f78b
95f3415
63ca183
2dc442d
2c580ce
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1 +1,2 @@ | ||
| node_modules | ||
| .venv |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ | ||
| import argparse | ||
| import sys | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def parse_args(): | ||
| parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( | ||
| description="Reads file(s) and writes them to the standard output", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument("paths", nargs="+", help="The file path(s) to process") | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-n", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| dest="number_all", | ||
| help="Number the output lines, starting at 1.", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-b", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| dest="number_nonblank", | ||
| help="Number only non-blank output lines, starting at 1.", | ||
| ) | ||
| return parser.parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def main(): | ||
| args = parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
| try: | ||
| for path in args.paths: | ||
| line_num = 1 | ||
|
|
||
| with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file: | ||
| for raw_line in file: | ||
| line = raw_line.rstrip("\n") | ||
| is_blank = line.strip() == "" | ||
| should_number = args.number_all or ( | ||
| args.number_nonblank and not is_blank) | ||
|
|
||
| if should_number: | ||
| print(f"{line_num} {line}") | ||
| line_num += 1 | ||
| else: | ||
| print(line) | ||
| except OSError as err: | ||
| print(err, file=sys.stderr) | ||
|
|
||
| return 0 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| main() |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ | ||
| import argparse | ||
| import os | ||
| import stat | ||
| import sys | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def parse_args(): | ||
| parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( | ||
| description="List directory contents", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "paths", | ||
| nargs="*", | ||
| help="The file path to process (defaults to current directory)", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-a", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| dest="include_hidden", | ||
| help="Include directory entries whose names begin with a dot ('.').", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-1", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| dest="one_per_line", | ||
| help="Force output to be one entry per line.", | ||
| ) | ||
| return parser.parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def filter_hidden(files: list[str]) -> list[str]: | ||
| return [name for name in files if not name.startswith(".")] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def get_visible_entries(files: list[str], include_hidden: bool): | ||
| return files if include_hidden else filter_hidden(files) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def format_entries(files: list[str], one_per_line: bool): | ||
| if len(files) == 0: | ||
| return | ||
| print(("\n" if one_per_line else "\t").join(files)) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+31
to
+42
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The parameter 'files' in 'format_entries', 'filter_hidden', and 'get_visible_entries' is used for both files and directory entries, which could be files or directories. Do you think a more general name like 'entries' would make it clearer that these lists can contain both files and directories? |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def main(): | ||
| args = parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
| try: | ||
| file_paths = args.paths if args.paths else ["."] | ||
| include_hidden = bool(args.include_hidden) | ||
| one_per_line = bool(args.one_per_line) | ||
|
|
||
| result_files: list[str] = [] | ||
| result_dirs: dict[str, list[str]] = {} | ||
|
|
||
| for file_path in file_paths: | ||
| st = os.stat(file_path) | ||
| # Is a file? | ||
| if stat.S_ISREG(st.st_mode): | ||
| result_files.append(file_path) | ||
| # Is a directory? | ||
| if stat.S_ISDIR(st.st_mode): | ||
|
Comment on lines
+58
to
+62
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've noticed that you have comments like '# Is a file?' and '# Is a directory?' right above the code that checks if a path is a file or directory. Since the code itself (using stat.S_ISREG and stat.S_ISDIR) is already quite clear about what it's doing, these comments don't add much value. When code is self-explanatory, extra comments can sometimes make the code harder to read by adding clutter. How might you decide when a comment is truly helpful versus when the code speaks for itself? |
||
| result_dirs[file_path] = os.listdir(file_path) | ||
|
|
||
| result_files = get_visible_entries(result_files, include_hidden) | ||
|
|
||
| if len(file_paths) == 1: | ||
| entries = list(result_files) | ||
| for contents in result_dirs.values(): | ||
| filtered = get_visible_entries(contents, include_hidden) | ||
| entries.extend(filtered) | ||
| format_entries(entries, one_per_line) | ||
| else: | ||
| format_entries(result_files, one_per_line) | ||
|
|
||
| for directory, contents in result_dirs.items(): | ||
| print("\n" + directory + ":") | ||
| filtered = get_visible_entries(contents, include_hidden) | ||
| format_entries(filtered, one_per_line) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+76
to
+79
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In the section where you print directory contents for multiple directories, the logic for filtering and formatting entries is repeated. If you needed to change how entries are displayed, you'd have to update it in more than one place. How could you refactor this to avoid repeating yourself? |
||
| except OSError as err: | ||
| print(str(err), file=sys.stderr) | ||
|
|
||
| return 0 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| main() | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| tabulate |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ | ||
| import argparse | ||
| import os | ||
| import sys | ||
|
|
||
| from tabulate import tabulate | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def parse_args(): | ||
| parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( | ||
| description="word, line and byte count", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument("paths", nargs="+", | ||
| help="The file path(s) to process.") | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-l", | ||
| "--lines", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| help="The number of lines in each input file is written to the standard output.", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-w", | ||
| "--words", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| help="The number of words in each input file is written to the standard output.", | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| "-c", | ||
| "--bytes", | ||
| action="store_true", | ||
| dest="bytes", | ||
| help="The number of bytes in each input file is written to the standard output.", | ||
| ) | ||
| return parser.parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def main(): | ||
| args = parse_args() | ||
|
|
||
| try: | ||
| file_paths: list[str] = args.paths | ||
| results: dict[str, dict[str, int]] = {} | ||
|
|
||
| for file_path in file_paths: | ||
| stats = os.stat(file_path) | ||
| count = {"lines": 0, "words": 0, "bytes": stats.st_size} | ||
|
|
||
| with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file: | ||
| for line in file: | ||
| count["lines"] += 1 | ||
| trimmed = line.strip() | ||
| if len(trimmed) > 0: | ||
| count["words"] += len(trimmed.split()) | ||
|
|
||
| results[file_path] = count | ||
|
|
||
| if len(file_paths) > 1: | ||
| total = {"lines": 0, "words": 0, "bytes": 0} | ||
| for file_count in results.values(): | ||
| total["lines"] += file_count["lines"] | ||
| total["words"] += file_count["words"] | ||
| total["bytes"] += file_count["bytes"] | ||
| results["total"] = total | ||
|
|
||
| no_options_provided = not (args.lines or args.words or args.bytes) | ||
| selected_option_keys: list[str] = [] | ||
|
|
||
| if args.lines: | ||
| selected_option_keys.append("lines") | ||
| if args.words: | ||
| selected_option_keys.append("words") | ||
| if args.bytes: | ||
| selected_option_keys.append("bytes") | ||
|
|
||
| output_columns = [ | ||
| "lines", "words", "bytes"] if no_options_provided else selected_option_keys | ||
| rows: list[list[str | int]] = [] | ||
| for name, values in results.items(): | ||
| rows.append([name] + [values[column] for column in output_columns]) | ||
|
|
||
| if no_options_provided: | ||
| print(tabulate(rows, headers=[ | ||
| "index"] + output_columns)) | ||
| else: | ||
| print(tabulate(rows, headers=[ | ||
| "index"] + output_columns)) | ||
| except OSError as err: | ||
| print(str(err), file=sys.stderr) | ||
|
|
||
| return 0 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| main() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function 'get_visible_entries' returns either all files or only non-hidden files, depending on the 'include_hidden' flag. The name 'get_visible_entries' might suggest it always returns only visible (non-hidden) entries, but it can also return hidden ones. Could you think of a name that more clearly describes what this function does based on its parameters?