Refactor if/else statements to use guard clauses for improved readability #206
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR refactors if/else statements to use guard clauses where efficient and clear, reducing code nesting and improving readability.
Changes Made
Route Files - Converted the pattern
if (condition) { action } else { error }toif (!condition) { error; return } action:App Configuration - Simplified maintenance mode check:
Files Modified
routes/patchSet.jsroutes/patchUnset.jsroutes/patchUpdate.jsapp.jsThe changes follow the principle of using early returns for error conditions, reducing nesting levels and making the happy path more prominent. All other if/else patterns in the codebase were analyzed and determined to be appropriate for their specific use cases (business logic with multiple valid paths, configuration assignments, etc.).
Fixes #173.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.