-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
pass iter-ith iteration of zetar #635
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
testing: |
ccarouge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy with the canopy stuff but I'm not sure why there are changes to biogeochem_casa in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't the changes for cable_runtime%esm15 come separately? There is no link with the iter stuff in cbl_friction_vel.F90
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah don't know how these got mixed up. I'm sure there was another PR with this stuff in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
strange - I went to revert it, it didn't like that - so I just compared it to another local version of the file and the change wasn't even there. I pushed - it refreshed GH - and the change is gone. Of course I could've done it yesterday and just forgotten about it
|
@JhanSrbinovsky another question: is this coming from UM7? |
The change in CASA? In general? No nothing from me is UM7 anymore. (I've been doing other things. urban model in AM3 being the most exciting) Hopefully we'll swap in the library soon and then. just keep updating that. Although there was a comment on an outstanding issue (probably in UM7) about making this simplification to avoid a potential bug in re-declaration of zetar as (mp, iter) when it should be mp, niter. It never actually caused a problem (I think) but we can avoid it entirely |
CABLE
Thank you for submitting a pull request to the CABLE Project.
Description
Received arg declared erroneously. Rather than resolve only need to send current ittteration (from define_canopy() ) part of the array anyway.
see #521
Fixes #521
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Testing
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cable--635.org.readthedocs.build/en/635/