Add options to specify block/element/modifier selector templates #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I needed this for a project with non-BEM classes and thought it would be handy to use the Bike plugin with options to specify the template of the selectors for block/element/modifiers, using template strings/string literals.
Not sure of any security implications of using lodash.template which I think runs eval() on the template?
The templates can be specified in the options as:
{ blockFormat: '.${block}', elementFormat: '.${block}__${elem}', modifierFormat: '${base}_${key}_${value}', modifierFormatTrue: '${base}_${key}' }Since this project is BEM-focused then this functionality might not really be needed or suitable but thought I'd leave this here for any interested people.