-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
Update autoentities when hot-reload succeeds #3297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
RubenCerna2079
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
dev/rubencerna/autoentities-with-hot-reload
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+121
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b4e200
Add hot-reload support
RubenCerna2079 73840d1
Add hot-reload tests
RubenCerna2079 2871a9a
Fix bug that allowed autoentities.permissions to be empty
RubenCerna2079 4387720
Merge branch 'main' into dev/rubencerna/autoentities-with-hot-reload
RubenCerna2079 fa6a265
Fix tests
RubenCerna2079 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -971,6 +971,16 @@ public void ValidatePermissionsInConfig(RuntimeConfig runtimeConfig) | |
| foreach ((string entityName, Entity entity) in runtimeConfig.Entities) | ||
| { | ||
| HashSet<EntityActionOperation> totalSupportedOperationsFromAllRoles = new(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (entity.Permissions.Length == 0) | ||
| { | ||
| HandleOrRecordException(new DataApiBuilderException( | ||
| message: $"Entity: {entityName} has no permissions defined.", | ||
| statusCode: HttpStatusCode.ServiceUnavailable, | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. should we let DAB to be entirely unavailble for a single entity having no permissions or let it pass for others and log in the missing permission entities as warnings/errors and have DAB available? |
||
| subStatusCode: DataApiBuilderException.SubStatusCodes.ConfigValidationError)); | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| foreach (EntityPermission permissionSetting in entity.Permissions) | ||
| { | ||
| string roleName = permissionSetting.Role; | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does not throw any error when we remove the autoentities from the collection
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Copilot has a valid point. we should not modify the same collection in the loop. the suggestion from Copilot is a fail-safe approach. collect the keys to remove first and remove them separately.