Skip to content

Conversation

@mcgallan
Copy link
Member

@mcgallan mcgallan commented Dec 9, 2025

Choose a PR Template

Switch to "Preview" on this description then select one of the choices below.

Click here to open a PR for a Data Plane API.

Click here to open a PR for a Control Plane (ARM) API.

Click here to open a PR for only SDK configuration.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Microsoft.StorageSync
Go sdk/resourcemanager/storagesync/armstoragesync
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-storagesync
Python azure-mgmt-storagesync
JavaScript @azure/arm-storagesync

@pshao25 pshao25 marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2025 07:02
@github-actions github-actions bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Dec 9, 2025
@pshao25 pshao25 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChange-Go-Sdk BreakingChange-Go-Sdk-Approved BreakingChange-JavaScript-Sdk BreakingChange-JavaScript-Sdk-Approved PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. resource-manager StorageSync TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants