Skip to content

Conversation

@fchinu
Copy link
Contributor

@fchinu fchinu commented Dec 17, 2025

This PR adds the possibility to produce very small trees to be used in the analysis.
During previous presentations at the PAG, it was requested to also check the distribution of some topological variables, so I added the possibility to extend the mini trees with few other columns.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pwghf PWG-HF label Dec 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Add mini trees to Ds task [PWGHF] Add mini trees to Ds task Dec 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, ⚠️ 0 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Dec 17, 2025

Hi @fchinu , please clarify the motivation for adding the trees. There already are workflows to store trees.

@fchinu
Copy link
Contributor Author

fchinu commented Dec 17, 2025

Hi @vkucera! I updated the description. I add here that since these small trees can be used directly for analyses I thought of adding them to the task output, while other tasks produce very large output trees containing many variables, and are usually run on small datasets for model training. These trees can be in principle a replacement of the output sparses, which we know of having few problems for large datasets (e.g. they can't be merged for a size > 1 GB), also allowing the users to have the possibility to perform an unbinned analysis

@fgrosa fgrosa merged commit 18f9565 into AliceO2Group:master Dec 18, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pwghf PWG-HF

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants