-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 615
[PWGCF] Addition of named constants in PID function #13433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…unction for labelled arrays
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, |
[PWGCF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#13433
| PIONS = 0, | ||
| KAONS, | ||
| PROTONS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still believe this is inconsistent a dangerous
Depending on the part of the code you look at this assignment is true or is false
I understand you try to use a single configurable to address identified or not particles and which of the identified particle is of interest but this clearly creates an inconsistency between parts of your code
I would suggest trying to address that situation in a different way
victor-gonzalez
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve it for the time being but have a look at my comment, I believe it is worth to try a little bit different approach
Co-authored-by: Preet Pati <preet@preet-6.local> Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: Preet Pati <preet@preet-6.local> Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
No description provided.