Skip to content

Conversation

@coppedis
Copy link
Contributor

We've added a task and a table to better understand and check the ZDC signals in the pO, OO and Ne-Ne runs.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2025

O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, ⚠️ 0 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Task to study ZDC response and calibration in light ion data taking [Common,PWGLF] Task to study ZDC response and calibration in light ion data taking Oct 15, 2025
@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2025 18:21
@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Oct 15, 2025

@coppedis Your PR is not well formatted, yet you opened it as ready for review which triggered compilation tests which are useless at this point and will have to run again.

@coppedis coppedis marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 09:30
@coppedis
Copy link
Contributor Author

If I am not totally wrong, all the remaining linter issues are related to CMakeLists.txt of Common/TableProducer.
If I am not overlooking something, may I ask @ddobrigk to let me know whether we could merge this PR?

Thanks in advance for your help and understanding.
ch.

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Oct 27, 2025

If I am not totally wrong, all the remaining linter issues are related to CMakeLists.txt of Common/TableProducer. If I am not overlooking something, may I ask @ddobrigk to let me know whether we could merge this PR?

Thanks in advance for your help and understanding. ch.

Hi @coppedis , the linter also complains about wrong \file documentation field for the zdcTaskLightIons.cxx file, which is part of your changes. Please fix it.

@ddobrigk
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @coppedis , I think the change to the CMakeLists.txt of the PWGMM directory is accidental, right? Could you please remove that change from the PR? I will then approve. Thank you!

@coppedis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @coppedis , I think the change to the CMakeLists.txt of the PWGMM directory is accidental, right? Could you please remove that change from the PR? I will then approve. Thank you!

Dear @ddobrigk this was a fix (newline at the end of the file) that I erroneously put in and Vit kindly asked me to remove. What do you want me to do? Leave it as approved by Vit or revert to some even previous version? Please, let me know.
Thanks a lot for your help

@ddobrigk
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @coppedis, I think the proper course of action is to leave that CMakeLists file totally unchanged, since you added a task only to Common - it looks confusing that this PR tags PWGLF when in fact you (from what I understand?) only fix one linter issue or so there and it is totally unrelated to the actual work in this PR. To proceed, can you please just take the CMakeLists as it is in the O2Physics master and use that in this PR? If really needed, we can adjust newlines there with a separate PR. Thank you!

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Oct 28, 2025

Hi @coppedis , it seems that you overwrote the history of your branch and force-pushed to the remote repository, which is explicitly discouraged in the contribution guidelines. Now your PR makes some unrelated changes in an unrelated file PWGLF/TableProducer/CMakeLists.txt. Please avoid destructive edits of your PR and check your commits before you push them to a PR under review.

@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2025 21:45
@coppedis coppedis closed this Oct 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants