Skip to content

Conversation

@Marcellocosti
Copy link
Contributor

Several configurables introduced in #12176 are not needed when processing triggered data as the BDT selections on the D0 are not pt-differential at trigger level.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 26, 2025

O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, ⚠️ 0 warnings, 🔕 4 disabled

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Simplify D0 ML selections in D* selector [PWGHF] Simplify D0 ML selections in D* selector Aug 26, 2025
@Marcellocosti
Copy link
Contributor Author

I noticed that, in the D* selector, the ML features of interest for the D0 are treated differently for negative and positive D* candidates. If I understood correctly, this is not needed for mimicking the trigger selections, thus the function getInputFeaturesTrigger in HfMlResponseDstarToD0Pi.h should be fine. @fgrosa can you confirm this?

@Marcellocosti Marcellocosti changed the title [PWGHF] Simplify D0 ML selections in D* selector [PWGHF] Remove redundant D0 ML selection in D* selector Aug 27, 2025
@fgrosa fgrosa merged commit 2ab1d97 into AliceO2Group:master Aug 27, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
jinhyunni pushed a commit to jinhyunni/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
ThePhDane pushed a commit to ThePhDane/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
jloemker pushed a commit to jloemker/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2025
alibuild pushed a commit to alibuild/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants