-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
[PWGHF,PWGCF] Filling the candidate and track table before pairing and add option for deuteron #12459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 43 errors, |
[PWGHF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12459
| DECLARE_SOA_TABLE(FDHfPairs, "AOD", "FDHFPAIRS", //! table to store results for HF femtoscopy | ||
| fdhf::CharmM, | ||
| fdhf::CharmPt, | ||
| fdhf::TrkPt, | ||
| fdhf::BDTBkg, | ||
| fdhf::BDTPrompt, | ||
| fdhf::BDTFD, | ||
| fdhf::Kstar, | ||
| fdhf::KT, | ||
| fdhf::MT, | ||
| fdhf::Mult, | ||
| fdhf::MultPercentile, | ||
| fdhf::Charge, | ||
| fdhf::PairSign, | ||
| fdhf::ProcessType, | ||
| fdhf::FlagMc, | ||
| fdhf::OriginMcRec); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this not part of a previous open PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @victor-gonzalez, This was not part of the previous PR. But indeed, we had it in the very beginning (hald year ago), then later removed it because we wanted to separate charm candidates and tracks for the Lc baryon femtoscopy analysis.
Now, I restore it in this PR to make things more convenient for more abundant hf particles like Dplus mesons, where mixed-event processing can be done easily online. Sorry for the confusion, but this is what we want now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve the PR as the explanation sounds reasonable.
…d add option for deuteron (AliceO2Group#12459) Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
…d add option for deuteron (AliceO2Group#12459) Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
…d add option for deuteron (AliceO2Group#12459) Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
…d add option for deuteron (AliceO2Group#12459) Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
No description provided.