-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
[PWGHF] Add D*pi channel in B0 reduced workflow #12451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 4 errors, |
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12451
99acfba to
5911f24
Compare
fgrosa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Marcellocosti, thanks for the development!
I have a comment about the data structure. I would not call the "Dstar" table "Dstar", since it contains basically D0 features. Also, there is some duplication of information that is not necessary, and you can handle a bit better. See my comments below, if you need clarifications let me know!
vkucera
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Marcellocosti for addressing my comments.
Approving to not block the review by @fgrosa .
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12451
| hf_cand::E<hf_cand_2prong::Px, hf_cand_2prong::Py, hf_cand_2prong::Pz>, | ||
| hf_cand::E2<hf_cand_2prong::Px, hf_cand_2prong::Py, hf_cand_2prong::Pz>); | ||
|
|
||
| DECLARE_SOA_TABLE(HfCandB0DStar, "AOD", "HFCANDB0DSTAR", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This table seems produced only by candidateCreatorB0Reduced.cxx. Why is it defined in the main data model?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it would be clearer to have this table declared close to HfCandB0Base (table for the D-pi channel) since it is its respective table for the D*Pi channel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @vkucera I think it's good to keep it there for 2 reasons:
- consistency with the other channels
- in the future this channel might be considered to be added in the "non reduced" workflow, for instance if there will be an interest to include it in the HF-jet analyses (in principle we expect this to have more or less the same performance as
B0 -> D-pi+)
PWGHF/Core/HfMlResponseB0ToDPi.h
Outdated
| #define PWGHF_CORE_HFMLRESPONSEB0TODPI_H_ | ||
|
|
||
| #include "PWGHF/Core/HfMlResponse.h" | ||
| #include "PWGHF/D2H/DataModel/ReducedDataModel.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this header as later in the same file I retrieve the soft pion of the D*, using the tables declared in ReducedDataModel.h with the line
auto prongSoftPi = candidate.template prongSoftPi_as<o2::soa::Join<o2::aod::HfRedSoftPiBases, o2::aod::HfRedSoftPiCov, o2::aod::HfRedSoftPiPid>>();
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12451
Thanks @Marcellocosti, it's good for me now! |
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
This PR adds the D* pi final state for the B0 meson in the reduced workflow. Separate tables and functions have been created for D*, please let me know if you prefer other solutions.