Skip to content

Conversation

@njacazio
Copy link
Contributor

@njacazio njacazio commented Nov 4, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@njacazio
Copy link
Contributor Author

njacazio commented Nov 4, 2025

Ciao @jackal1-66 I saw that the generation is quite demanding, I would increase the number of events without restricting the CPU. What do you think?
Tagging @BanajitBarman

@jackal1-66
Copy link
Collaborator

Ciao @njacazio , theoretically I have no issue with this PR, however this file should be used for the LF production requested by Giuseppe https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/O2-6220. Are you in touch with him and have agreed to change the number of freeze-out events? Is there a strong reason to change the freeze-out events? It would be interesting to check the CPU time difference between the two configurations.

@njacazio
Copy link
Contributor Author

njacazio commented Nov 4, 2025

Ciao @jackal1-66 I see, good point. Let's do another file then. The CPU usage is about the same but the number of events is x10.

@njacazio njacazio changed the title EPOS: Increase number of freeze out events to 10 EPOS: add pp 13.6 TeV Nov 4, 2025
@jackal1-66
Copy link
Collaborator

Ciao Niccolo' sorry I think I explained myself badly. You need to delete the test file you created and simply add at the top of the ini file you're adding the string #---> GeneratorEPOS4

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
[GeneratorExternal]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add:
#---> GeneratorEPOS4
this will redirect the generator test to a pre-existing one

eos x3ff !eos activated (epos standard EoS)
hacas full !hadronic cascade activated (UrQMD)
set nfreeze 10 !number of freeze out events per hydro event
set nfreeze 1 !number of freeze out events per hydro event
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete space and add tab? Just so that the file is not considered in the diff (cleaner way)

@njacazio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ciao @jackal1-66 do you get the error? Is it legit?

@jackal1-66
Copy link
Collaborator

Ciao Nicolo' I will run some local tests

@jackal1-66
Copy link
Collaborator

The issue is localised in the CI test. There might be a problem simply with EPOS4, I need to debug this further, however I tested EPOS4 both in a docker and in my local installation. Your configuration is literally the same as the usual validated one. So I will merge this and take note to look into the CI failure.

@jackal1-66 jackal1-66 merged commit 13773b5 into master Nov 10, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@jackal1-66 jackal1-66 deleted the njacazio-patch-1 branch November 10, 2025 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants