Skip to content

Conversation

@sawenzel
Copy link
Contributor

Improvement for configuration: Apply the key-values from the generic config on top of the anchorConfig, if the anchorConfig does not have these keys themselves. Useful for key-values in the digitization space for instance since they are not mentioned in async reco workflows.

In addition, actually apply FT0DigParam and FV0DigParam to the digitization of FIT. This didn't have any effect so far.

Improvement for configuration: Apply the key-values from the generic
config on top of the anchorConfig, if the anchorConfig does not have these
keys themselves. Useful for key-values in the digitization space for instance
since they are not mentioned in async reco workflows.

In addition, actually apply FT0DigParam and FV0DigParam to the digitization
of FIT. This didn't have any effect so far.
@github-actions
Copy link

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@sawenzel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixes an issue where FT0,FV0 were never applied in digitization despite intentions in this PR #1962

@sawenzel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shahor02 : Could you take a look if this is ok? I see that now we are also getting MFTAlpideParam which we never picked up before.

Copy link
Collaborator

@shahor02 shahor02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sawenzel looks fine, but what do you mean by MFTAlipedParam not used? It is loaded from the CCDB.

@sawenzel sawenzel merged commit df30b72 into AliceO2Group:master Jun 22, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants