pp: relax ITS reco cuts wrt PbPb, extend TPC matching to PR78 #1956
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The ITS reco cuts used for PbPb are currently defaults in the compiled code and they are too strict for pp.
This will relax the ITS track-length-dependent pT cuts and remove restriction for starting layer added for PbPb.
Also will impose TPC matching starting from pad-row 78, like in PbPb
For the record: some comparison of pp-anchored MC performance (LHC24af_550916) with different settings :
like PbPb(both ITS reco: MinPt: NC7:0.08 NC6:0.20 NC5:1.00 NC4:0.17, 4point tracks can start from Lr0 and Lr3 only + matching starting from PR78)old ppITS reco but with matching from PR79tunedITS reco with less strict cuts than in PbPb to minimize fakes (MinPt: NC7:0.05 NC6:0.09 NC5:0.17 NC4:0.13, starting layers requirements like in pbpb) : used in this PR.K0s with global and any tracks: "tuned" has a tiny advantage over

old ppin theglo, while the latter shows a better integrated result.Probability to match TPC track (min 60 clusters, |dca|<6 and |tgL|<1 to ITS: the tuned one has a tiny edge

Number of PVs and their contributors distribution (all and globals only):
tunedone produces most of PVs (tiny difference) but in average has more global contributors.ping to @mpuccio