MID: check the filtered digits in the async QC

[dstocco]

This PR allows for a better comparison between data and MC.
The masks are applied during reconstruction for both data and MC. But data are already masked since this is done at the electronics level, while MC is masked only during reconstruction.
So far the QC checked for digits before the masks are applied, which leads to a difference between data and MC.
This PR introduces a check on digits after the masks are applied, so that we can compare apples to apples.

[github-actions]

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

[lucaquaglia15]

Hello, is there any news on this PR? Thanks from the MID aQC team ;)

[lmassacr]

Hi all,
It seems the failure of the CI is unrelated to the code, but to a token issue. Can this PR be approved and merged?