Skip to content

Conversation

@ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Jan 28, 2025

This is a property that depends on user input, so an empty workflow is actually
possible and should be handled. This currently breaks if the empty workflow is
provided in debug mode.

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 08:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

This is a property that depends on user input, so an empty workflow is actually
possible and should be handled. This currently breaks if the empty workflow is
provided in debug mode.
@ktf ktf merged commit f946c53 into AliceO2Group:dev Jan 28, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Jan 28, 2025

Tested locally, currently broken. Empty workflows need to be handled just fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant