Skip to content

Conversation

@mconcas
Copy link
Collaborator

@mconcas mconcas commented Dec 9, 2024

No description provided.

@mconcas mconcas requested a review from shahor02 as a code owner December 9, 2024 17:43
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

@mconcas mconcas changed the title Improve logging in case of OOM ITS tracking: Improve logging in case of OOM Dec 9, 2024
@mconcas mconcas merged commit f4f8f43 into AliceO2Group:dev Dec 10, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@mconcas mconcas deleted the pr_its_mprove_logging branch December 10, 2024 08:15
@mconcas mconcas added async-2024-pp-apass1 Request porting to async-2024-pp-apass1 async-2024-PbPb-apass1 labels Dec 10, 2024
@alcaliva
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @mconcas , is this needed for async 2024 pp apass1? I get conflicts when I try to port it to the tag

@mconcas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mconcas commented Dec 12, 2024

Hi @alcaliva, for pp this is not super important, it would be nice to have, but if it creates issues I can drop it.

@chiarazampolli
Copy link
Collaborator

Ciao Matteo,

Apass1 was already done, only PRs for anchored MCs should be cherry-picked for the simulations anchored to the pass. I guess this is not needed there.

Chiara

@mconcas mconcas removed the async-2024-pp-apass1 Request porting to async-2024-pp-apass1 label Dec 12, 2024
@mconcas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mconcas commented Dec 12, 2024

Ciao Matteo,

Apass1 was already done, only PRs for anchored MCs should be cherry-picked for the simulations anchored to the pass. I guess this is not needed there.

Chiara

ok, I removed the label.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants