Use repo-stable trajectory project IDs#30
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 3 minutes and 50 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a robust project ID resolution mechanism in src/core/project-id.ts that determines project IDs from explicit options, environment variables, package.json metadata (repository URLs or package names), or git remotes. This logic is integrated into the CLI start command and SDK client, replacing the previous fallback to process.cwd(). The review comments identify several valid improvement opportunities and bug fixes, including optimizing redundant disk I/O by passing pre-parsed package.json objects, continuing directory traversal when encountering malformed JSON files, ensuring cross-platform path handling for Windows backslashes, and refining object type guards to exclude arrays.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 85b1e2e79e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
willwashburn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Addressed review feedback in 88c2a3b and resolved the fixed threads. CI is green.
Summary
Tests