-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add Copilot support #232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Copilot support #232
Conversation
…or Developer, and Specification Master
WalkthroughAdds multiple new repository governance documents: five agent role definitions under Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not introduce new multi-component runtime flow) Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/agents/devops-engineer.agent.md.github/agents/reviewer.agent.md.github/agents/sdet.agent.md.github/agents/senior-developer.agent.md.github/agents/specification-master.agent.md.github/copilot-instructions.md.github/copilot-review-rules.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/copilot-review-rules.md
[grammar] ~20-~20: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ..., wide refactors). - Additional focus: - Re‑validate that previous review comments were corr...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
.github/copilot-instructions.md
[uncategorized] ~108-~108: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...nd input validation - version_tag_check/github_repository.py: GitHub API wrapper - ver...
(GITHUB)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
.github/copilot-instructions.md
29-29: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
30-30: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
31-31: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
114-114: Hard tabs
Column: 4
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/agents/senior-developer.agent.md (1)
1-29: ✓ Well-structured agent governance document.Clear mission, inputs, outputs, and measurable quality gates. Aligns well with the broader governance framework across agent definitions.
.github/agents/sdet.agent.md (1)
1-29: ✓ Clear testing governance with determinism and CI emphasis.Well-defined role with explicit mocking and determinism requirements. Aligns with governance expectations and Senior Developer quality gates.
.github/copilot-review-rules.md (1)
1-27: ✓ Clear review guidelines with pragmatic focus.Well-prioritized review scopes (Default vs. Double-check) with actionable checklists. Emphasis on short, referenced feedback without verbose rewrites is excellent for maintainability.
.github/copilot-instructions.md (1)
1-127: Comprehensive and actionable Copilot guidance.Excellent coverage of context, coding standards, quality gates, and common pitfalls. The structured checklist, architecture notes, and learned rules will help maintain consistency across Copilot-driven contributions. Address the hard tab formatting issues noted above.
.github/agents/reviewer.agent.md (1)
1-29: ✓ Clear review governance with measurable gates.Well-defined mission and responsibilities. The emphasis on focused changes, measurable quality gates, and coordination with Specification Master and SDET creates a cohesive governance model.
…in Specification Master agent documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/copilot-review-rules.md (1)
1-27: Well-structured review governance framework.The document clearly defines two distinct review scopes with explicit priorities and actionable checks. The structure (scope → priorities → checks → response format) is consistent and easy to follow. Guidance for Default and Double-check reviews appropriately scales effort based on risk.
One minor housekeeping detail: ensure the file ends with a newline character (currently missing per the summary). This is a common repository convention and helps with tooling/diffs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/agents/devops-engineer.agent.md.github/agents/reviewer.agent.md.github/agents/sdet.agent.md.github/agents/senior-developer.agent.md.github/agents/specification-master.agent.md.github/copilot-review-rules.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/agents/senior-developer.agent.md
- .github/agents/devops-engineer.agent.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .github/agents/reviewer.agent.md
- .github/agents/specification-master.agent.md
- .github/agents/sdet.agent.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/copilot-review-rules.md
[grammar] ~20-~20: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ..., wide refactors). - Additional focus: - Re‑validate that previous review comments were corr...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
Overview
Add copilot setup and introduce agents.
Release Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.