Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update rails 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1 (major) #560

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
depfu wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

🚨 [security] Update rails 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1 (major) #560

depfu wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Aug 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rails (7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ webrick (1.8.2 → 1.9.2) · Repo

Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in block_format in Action Mailer

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the block_format helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the block_format helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 requires Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling the block_format helper or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to yuki_osaki for the report!

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionpack (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in HTTP Token authentication in Action Controller

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in Action Controller's HTTP Token authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47887.

Impact

For applications using HTTP Token authentication via authenticate_or_request_with_http_token or similar, a carefully crafted header may cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in query parameter filtering in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the query parameter filtering routines of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-41128.

Impact

Carefully crafted query parameters can cause query parameter filtering to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for the report and patches!

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in plain_text_for_blockquote_node in Action Text

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper in Action Text. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47888.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling plain_text_for_blockquote_node or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionview (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activejob (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Active Record logging vulnerable to ANSI escape injection

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193

Impact

The ID passed to find or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credits

Thanks to lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this vulnerability

🚨 Active Record logging vulnerable to ANSI escape injection

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193

Impact

The ID passed to find or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credits

Thanks to lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this vulnerability

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Active Storage allowed transformation methods that were potentially unsafe

Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default.

The default allowed list contains three methods allowing for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-24293.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.5.2, 7.2.2.2, 8.0.2.1

Impact

This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous.

Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong ImageMagick security policy deployed.

Credits

Thank you lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this!

🚨 Active Storage allowed transformation methods that were potentially unsafe

Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default.

The default allowed list contains three methods allowing for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-24293.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.5.2, 7.2.2.2, 8.0.2.1

Impact

This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous.

Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong ImageMagick security policy deployed.

Credits

Thank you lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this!

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activesupport (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ connection_pool (indirect, 2.5.4 → 3.0.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.0.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

3.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

3.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

2.5.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ date (indirect, 3.5.0 → 3.5.1) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ erb (indirect, 4.0.4 → 6.0.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.0.0

More info than we can show here.

5.1.3

More info than we can show here.

5.1.2

More info than we can show here.

5.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.1.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.0.3 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.0.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ psych (indirect, 5.2.6 → 5.3.0) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ railties (indirect, 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

8.0.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

7.2.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rdoc (indirect, 6.15.1 → 6.17.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.17.0

More info than we can show here.

6.16.1

More info than we can show here.

6.16.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ stringio (indirect, 3.1.8 → 3.1.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.1.9

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ timeout (indirect, 0.4.4 → 0.5.0) · Repo

Release Notes

0.5.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

🆕 uri (added, 1.1.1)

🆕 useragent (added, 0.16.11)

🗑️ cgi (removed)

🗑️ mutex_m (removed)

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Aug 14, 2025
@depfu depfu bot force-pushed the depfu/update/group/rails-8.0.2.1 branch from 615e103 to 9cbb15f Compare October 7, 2025 18:43
@mayorova mayorova force-pushed the depfu/update/group/rails-8.0.2.1 branch from b3589df to 53c5665 Compare November 5, 2025 15:19
@mayorova mayorova marked this pull request as draft November 5, 2025 15:23
@depfu depfu bot force-pushed the depfu/update/group/rails-8.0.2.1 branch from 53c5665 to 1f70b27 Compare November 12, 2025 18:30
@depfu depfu bot force-pushed the depfu/update/group/rails-8.0.2.1 branch from 1f70b27 to b58c09a Compare December 10, 2025 10:10
@depfu depfu bot changed the title 🚨 [security] Update rails 7.0.8.7 → 8.0.2.1 (major) 🚨 [security] Update rails 7.1.6 → 8.0.2.1 (major) Dec 10, 2025
@depfu depfu bot force-pushed the depfu/update/group/rails-8.0.2.1 branch from b58c09a to 511ad57 Compare December 11, 2025 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

depfu

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant