Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

Adjust file selection UI

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

  • Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
  • Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
  • Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

Adjust file selection UI
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from zhengkunwang223. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

<style lang="scss" scoped>
.file-list {
position: relative;
.close {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code you provided is about rendering a page with some buttons that can navigate between pages. Let's examine the code briefly to find any irregularities, potential issues, or opportunities for improvement:

There doesn't seem to be significant issues currently. The design seems straightforward and efficient.

If there were any specific areas of concern or improvements to suggest, we'd need more details about what specific aspects of this code are important, especially if you're planning on optimizing it further. However, generally speaking:

  1. Make sure input forms (in newFolder, say) don't accept too long values since they might lead to errors upon submission.
  2. If possible, ensure all button tooltips use consistent icons rather than repeating text, which could make your application more user-friendly.
  3. Consider using Vue Router's <router-view> component instead because Vue Router has built-in navigation links based on routes.

Remember, these suggestions may not apply directly due to minor inconsistencies and differences within the snippet itself; however, applying general recommendations should significantly improve the quality and usability of your application across different situations and platforms.

label: i18n.global.t('commons.button.uninstall'),
click: function (row: Runtime.SupportExtension) {
unInstallPHPExtension(row);
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code you provided has a potential issue with the unInstallPHPExtension function being marked as an async function. It might be a good idea to rethink about how to handle such data manipulation using this approach.

As for regularities of best practices and improvements, I can point out some aspects that could potentially improve the quality:

  • Use ES modules instead of CommonJS module format. This is a matter of personal preference and coding standards within JavaScript/Typescript communities, but it's generally considered better practice.

  • Avoid naming collisions among variables/functions. If these are named after functions that already exist (like "button"), ensure they aren't overwritten in future operations without proper redefinition or modification.

  • Ensure consistent use of types where appropriate. For example, consider declaring parameters for asynchronous calls like { click: Function() }.

Regarding optimization suggestions for readability and maintainability:

  • Use descriptive and meaningful names for components and actions (TaskLog, etc.)
  • Implement consistency in API usage, e.g., avoid unnecessary export default ...
  • Document all external dependencies and their versions

Lastly, always test thoroughly across various scenarios while debugging if needed!

label: i18n.global.t('commons.button.uninstall'),
click: function (row: Runtime.Runtime) {
operateModule('uninstall', row.name);
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet has no issues or irregularities found by comparing it to the current date in 2025. It is consistent and works as expected for the given functionalities of uninstallations in both button labels and functions.

However, if there were future modifications or additions of features within this context, additional checks might be needed. For instance, if there was an addition of new data sources or user accounts that need handling, these could also impact how those components interact with one another. Always remember, however, that any changes beyond what's already been defined in this code will require specific testing post-update.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Copy link
Member

@ssongliu ssongliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the lgtm label Mar 5, 2025
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit 8d2ea2f into dev-v2 Mar 5, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev-v2@common branch March 5, 2025 06:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants