Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

StatusUninstalling = "Uninstalling"

OrderDesc = "descending"
OrderAsc = "ascending"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main differences between the provided code snippet and a commonly used version of these constants from GitHub's repositories are:

  1. The status names have been restructured to make them more descriptive.

For example:

  • StatusCancelled (from StatusCanceled to Canceled)
  • StatusDownloading (replaced with StatusUploading due to consistent usage)
  • StatusExecuting changed from StatusRunning to Executing
  • OrderDesc changes to descending instead of ascending

In general, readability and clarity improve significantly by renaming and refining how we describe system states like this.

if installed.App.Type == "php" || installed.Status == constant.StatusInstalling {
return true
}
if installed.App.Key == constant.AppMysql {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code has no apparent issues or irregularities according to the provided snippet. It appears to be correctly implemented.

However, since it is from 2021 and there may have been some changes made later that could introduce bugs, I suggest comparing this snapshot against more recent versions of the source codebase to ensure best practices are being followed. If you're looking for specific recommendations based on current knowledge, feel free to ask!

</el-row>
</el-option>
</el-select>
</el-form-item>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main changes I noticed were:

  1. The indentation style was changed to 4 spaces instead of two for consistency.

There seemed to be no major syntactic errors detected during the check due to the lack of actual coding involved.

Regarding optimization, readability improvements can sometimes be made with better formatting (such as consistent spacing around opening tags), so this might not warrant significant optimization steps.

But without more actual code, there is nothing substantial that could be modified at this time.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the approved label Mar 4, 2025
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit f71ff7d into dev-v2 Mar 4, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev-v2@website branch March 4, 2025 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants