-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat: Restrict abnormal database selection during application install… #8059
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| StatusUninstalling = "Uninstalling" | ||
|
|
||
| OrderDesc = "descending" | ||
| OrderAsc = "ascending" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main differences between the provided code snippet and a commonly used version of these constants from GitHub's repositories are:
- The status names have been restructured to make them more descriptive.
For example:
- StatusCancelled (from
StatusCanceledtoCanceled) - StatusDownloading (replaced with
StatusUploadingdue to consistent usage) - StatusExecuting changed from
StatusRunningtoExecuting - OrderDesc changes to descending instead of ascending
In general, readability and clarity improve significantly by renaming and refining how we describe system states like this.
| if installed.App.Type == "php" || installed.Status == constant.StatusInstalling { | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
| if installed.App.Key == constant.AppMysql { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code has no apparent issues or irregularities according to the provided snippet. It appears to be correctly implemented.
However, since it is from 2021 and there may have been some changes made later that could introduce bugs, I suggest comparing this snapshot against more recent versions of the source codebase to ensure best practices are being followed. If you're looking for specific recommendations based on current knowledge, feel free to ask!
| </el-row> | ||
| </el-option> | ||
| </el-select> | ||
| </el-form-item> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main changes I noticed were:
- The indentation style was changed to 4 spaces instead of two for consistency.
There seemed to be no major syntactic errors detected during the check due to the lack of actual coding involved.
Regarding optimization, readability improvements can sometimes be made with better formatting (such as consistent spacing around opening tags), so this might not warrant significant optimization steps.
But without more actual code, there is nothing substantial that could be modified at this time.
|
wanghe-fit2cloud
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |




No description provided.