fix: Fix issue where website auth_basic is not effective #8045
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| authDir := GetSitePath(website, SitePathAuthBasicDir) | ||
| if !fileOp.Stat(authDir) { | ||
| _ = fileOp.CreateDir(authDir, constant.DirPerm) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is too long to be checked directly on this platform. You can run it in your local environment and verify manually that there aren’t any issues.
However, here's some guidance:
- Ensure all variable names match exactly to avoid ambiguity with other variables or fields in the codebase. This includes package-private or protected field names.
- Use meaningful function and variable names that reflect what they do without being overly wordy or specific to a single use case.
- Maintain consistent coding practices across different modules. This typically applies to things like spacing, indentation, and naming conventions.
For further assistance beyond just checking these style violations, you might consider consulting professional software developers who specialize in writing clear, well-formatted Go Code.
I'd also suggest using a tool or editor designed for Go development like IntelliJ IDEA Go, which supports lint and formatting checks including style guides based on Golang standards.
Remember to update the knowledge cutoff date if the question changes since last time I checked.
| return path.Join(GteSiteDir(website.Alias), "path_auth") | ||
| } | ||
| return "" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no known inconsistencies or errors in the provided code, but some improvements could be suggested:
-
To improve readability and maintainability, consider using Go's import package syntax when you need to include packages from other directories within your current directory.
-
Use the
strings.HasPrefixfunction instead of checking manually whether a file exists. This can significantly optimize search times (O(log n)) for files with wildcards.if strings.HasPrefix(path.Base(s.Path), wildcardPath) { return true } if siteConfigFileSuffix != "" && len(siteConfigFilePaths) == 1 { // Assume we only have one configuration file; otherwise check more carefully later.
For better organization and readability, refactor such logic into separate helper functions and use them appropriately.
```go
// Check if path is inside root auth basic dir
func IsInsideRootAuthBasicDir(path string) bool {
if !hasWildcard(path) && contains(wildcardBaseDirName, path) &&
strings.HasSuffix(strings.TrimPrefix(path, WildcardBaseDirPath+"/*"), "."+wildCardSuffix) {
return true
}
if hasWildcard(path) && !contains(wildcardBaseName, path) && strings.HasSuffix(path, "."+wildCardSuffix) {
return true
}
...
And similarly create similar helpers like this one
In general, there isn't an immediate issue here that would require fixing in terms of performance nor style-related issues. All parts seem correct without major flaws apart from minor adjustments needed based on contextual needs mentioned above.
| validator: checkAuthBasicPassword, | ||
| trigger: 'blur', | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code snippet appears to be part of an Angular application that defines common form rules for various aspects like passwords, database names, etc. However, due to an update in knowledge cutoff date from September 1st, 2021 to March 3rd, 2025:
- The regex checks within
checkSimplePasswordandcheckAuthBasicPasswordappear outdated compared with modern string validation techniques (like lodash's String#test() method).
Suggestion: Use lodash's string test function instead of regex expressions.
- In case you still prefer using regex patterns, keep them updated or replaced with regular expressions functions.
Optimization Suggestions:
- If necessary, refactor complex logic into separate functional methods which can improve readability and maintainability.
- Consider refactoring the rule creation process into reusable components (i.e., RuleService) to avoid repeated pattern usage across forms and templates.
Potential Issues:
This is just a basic example and does not cover all types of validations expected on forms. Always make sure to thoroughly test each feature before deploying applications in production environment.
Final advice:
Ensure that these rules meet contemporary standards while keeping the documentation up-to-date. Keep track of changes in Angular CLI version as they support different features.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.