Rename `imsc1/spec/ttml-ww-profiles.html` to e.g. `imsc1/spec/ttml-ww-text-profile.html`

[palemieux]

Just had a thought: how much trouble would it cause to rename imsc1/spec/ttml-ww-profiles.html to e.g. imsc1/spec/ttml-ww-text-profile.html? Just thinking ahead (maybe too far) to a potential request for a separate image profile spec in the future, and reflecting that it's no longer profiles but profile...

Originally posted by @nigelmegitt in #603 (comment)

[palemieux]

I would vote for imsc1/spec/text-profile.html

[nigelmegitt]

Thanks to @palemieux for pointing to https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aw3c%2Fimsc%20ttml-ww-profiles.html&type=code which shows there are several files that may need to change.

@himorin are there any other impacts for W3C if we change the filename of the main spec HTML page?

[palemieux]

In fact, I think we should just name it imsc1/spec/index.html so that there is no implied contents of the spec.

[nigelmegitt]

That would work too, however if we ever did want to publish a separate Image Profile, which I very much doubt we will, then I guess we would need a whole other repo for it. Or just publish a joint 2 profiles document again, I suppose.

[himorin]

@himorin are there any other impacts for W3C if we change the filename of the main spec HTML page?

on /TR/, older publications refer to current name/URL as Editors' Draft, so we may want to have redirecting page as current URL.
Or in some future, we also may want to have distinguish page to two profiles??

That would work too, however if we ever did want to publish a separate Image Profile, which I very much doubt we will, then I guess we would need a whole other repo for it. Or just publish a joint 2 profiles document again, I suppose.

+1 to separate repository or joint one. For streamlined publication, it should be possible to have two respec documents in one repository, but we may have issue for pr-preview.